David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Kantian Review 15 (1):57-87 (2010)
The central claim of Kant's political philosophy is that rational agents sharing a territory can justifiably be forced to live under a state; they have, in Kant's words, a duty of right to leave the state of nature. Perhaps something along these lines is entailed by any theory of state legitimacy, but the point raises special difficulties for Kant. He believes that rational agents have a right to freedom; that is, he believes that a rational agent's external freedom - her ability to set and pursue ends for herself without being subject to the choices of others - can justifiably be restricted only for the sake of external freedom itself. To establish that human beings can be forced to join a civil condition, it will therefore not do to show that the state promotes security, prosperity or any other such value: Kant has to show that human beings living side by side need a state to be free
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Kenneth Baynes (1989). Kant on Property Rights and the Social Contract. The Monist 72 (3):433-453.
Katrin Flikschuh (2007). Kant's Indemonstrable Postulate of Right: A Response to Paul Guyer. Kantian Review 12 (1):1-39.
Thomas Hobbes (1651/2006). Leviathan. Dover Publications.
J. Hruschka (2004). The Permissive Law of Practical Reason in Kant's Metaphysics of Morals. Law and Philosophy 23 (1):45-72.
Immanuel Kant (1930). Lectures on Ethics. London, Methuen & Co. Ltd..
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kenneth R. Westphal (2002). ‘A Kantian Justification of Possession’. In M. Timmons (ed.), Kant’s Metaphysics of Ethics: Interpretive Essays. Oxford.
Barry Smith & Leo Zaibert (2001). The Metaphysics of Real Estate. Topoi 20 (2):161-172.
Paul Guyer (2012). Hobbes Is of the Opposite Opinion Kant and Hobbes on the Three Authorities in the State. Hobbes Studies 25 (1):91-119.
Karl Widerquist (2009). A Dilemma for Libertarianism. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (1):43-72.
L. Wenar (1998). Original Acquisition of Private Property. Mind 107 (428):799-820.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1997). ‘Do Kant’s Principles Justify Property or Usufruct?’. Jahrbuch für Recht Und Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics 5:141-194.
Gopal Sreenivasan (1995). The Limits of Lockean Rights in Property. Oxford University Press.
Louis-Philippe Hodgson (2012). Realizing External Freedom: The Kantian Argument for a World State. In Elisabeth Ellis (ed.), Kant's Political Theory: Interpretations and Applications. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Rowan Cruft (2006). Against Individualistic Justifications of Property Rights. Utilitas 18 (2):154-172.
Reidar Maliks (2013). Kant, the State, and Revolution. Kantian Review 18 (1):29-47.
Jeremy Waldron (2005). Nozick and Locke: Filling the Space of Rights. Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1):81-110.
James Tully (1980). A Discourse on Property: John Locke and His Adversaries. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2010-09-12
Total downloads56 ( #33,860 of 1,410,123 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #28,555 of 1,410,123 )
How can I increase my downloads?