David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):134-165 (2004)
Logicism is, roughly speaking, the doctrine that mathematics is fancy logic. So getting clear about the nature of logic is a necessary step in an assessment of logicism. Logic is the study of logical concepts, how they are expressed in languages, their semantic values, and the relationships between these things and the rest of our concepts, linguistic expressions, and their semantic values. A logical concept is what can be expressed by a logical constant in a language. So the question “What is logic?” drives us to the question “What is a logical constant?” Though what follows contains some argument, limitations of space constrain me in large part to express my Credo on this topic with the broad brush of bold assertion and some promissory gestures.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Ian Hacking (1979). What is Logic? Journal of Philosophy 76 (6):285-319.
Mario Gomez-Torrente (2002). The Problem of Logical Constants. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (1):1-37.
Lawrence H. Powers (1978). Knowledge by Deduction. Philosophical Review 87 (3):337-371.
K. R. Popper (1947). New Foundations for Logic. Mind 56 (223):193-235.
Harold T. Hodes (1989). Three Value Logics: An Introduction, A Comparison of Various Logical Lexica and Some Philosophical Remarks. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 43 (2):99-145.
Citations of this work BETA
Brendan Jackson (2006). Logical Form: Classical Conception and Recent Challenges. Philosophy Compass 1 (3):303-316.
Harold T. Hodes (2008). On Some Concepts Associated with Finite Cardinal Numbers. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):657-658.
Similar books and articles
Peter Milne (1994). Classical Harmony: Rules of Inference and the Meaning of the Logical Constants. Synthese 100 (1):49 - 94.
Denis Bonnay (2006). Logicality and Invariance. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 14 (1):29-68.
HaroldHodes (2004). On the Sense and Reference of a Logical Constant. Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):134–165.
Peter Schroeder-Heister (1984). Popper's Theory of Deductive Inference and the Concept of a Logical Constant. History and Philosophy of Logic 5 (1):79-110.
Matthew W. McKeon (2010). The Concept of Logical Consequence: An Introduction to Philosophical Logic. Peter Lang Pub..
George Lakoff (1970). Linguistics and Natural Logic. Synthese 22 (1-2):151 - 271.
Henri Galinon (2009). A Note on Generalized Functional Completeness in the Realm of Elementrary Logic. Bulletin of the Section of Logic 38 (1):1-9.
Corine Besson (2010). Understanding the Logical Constants and Dispositions. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 5 (1):1-24.
Agustín Rayo & Timothy Williamson (2003). A Completeness Theorem for Unrestricted First-Order Languages. In Jc Beall (ed.), Liars and Heaps. Oxford University Press
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads79 ( #60,600 of 1,902,528 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #329,673 of 1,902,528 )
How can I increase my downloads?