|Abstract||One has it that earlier circumstances and the laws of nature uniquely determine later circumstances, and the other has it that past present and future all exist tenselessly in a ‘block universe,’ so that the passage of time and associated changes in the world are illusions or at best merely apparent.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Michael C. Laskowski (2003). An Application of Kochen's Theorem. Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (4):1181-1188.
Peter van Inwagen (1998). The Mystery of Metaphysical Freedom. In Peter van Inwagen & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), Van Inwagen, P.; Zimmerman, D. Metaphysics: The Big Questions. Blackwell.
C. Taylor & Daniel C. Dennett (2002). Who's Afraid of Determinism? Rethinking Causes and Possibilities. In Robert H. Kane (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. Oxford University Press.
Itamar Pitowsky (2004). Generalizations of Kochen and Specker's Theorem and the Effectiveness of Gleason's Theorem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (2):177-194.
Ehud Hrushovski & Itamar Pitowsky (2004). Generalizations of Kochen and Specker's Theorem and the Effectiveness of Gleason's Theorem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (2):177-194.
Kadri Vihvelin, Arguments for Incompatibilism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads45 ( #24,555 of 549,122 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,122 )
How can I increase my downloads?