The Need to Know—Therapeutic Privilege: A Way Forward [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Health Care Analysis 21 (2):105-129 (2013)
|Abstract||Providing patients with information is fundamental to respecting autonomy. However, there may be circumstances when information may be withheld to prevent serious harm to the patient, a concept referred to as therapeutic privilege. This paper provides an analysis of the ethical, legal and professional considerations which impact on a decision to withhold information that, in normal circumstances, would be given to the patient. It considers the status of the therapeutic privilege in English case law and concludes that, while reference is made to circumstances when information (primarily in relation to risk disclosure) may be withheld, further clarification is required on the status of therapeutic privilege. I suggest there has been shift in English law relating to the standard of information disclosure towards one set by the test of the reasonable, prudent patient. It is this shift that necessitates the existence of a therapeutic privilege which enables doctors to withhold information that would usually be given to the patient in order to prevent serious harm. I then explore the professional guidance in relation to information disclosure and how this relates to the legal position. There are strong ethical arguments in favour of disclosure of information to patients. In light of these, further clarification is required to identify and define the grounds on which this exception exists, the information that could lawfully be withheld and how this exception extends to rest of the health care team, particularly nurses. As such, explicit ethical and legal scrutiny of therapeutic privilege is needed in order to consider how this concept might be articulated, constrained and regulated|
|Keywords||Doctor-patient relationship Health care team Information disclosure Therapeutic privilege Truth-telling|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
C. Brown (forthcoming). Kant and Therapeutic Privilege. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (4):321-336.
Margaret A. Somerville (1984). Therapeutic Privilege: Variation on the Theme of Informed Consent. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 12 (1):4-12.
Cynthia Kaufman (2001). A User's Guide to White Privilege. Radical Philosophy Review 4 (1/2):30-38.
Carolyn Johnston & Genevieve Holt (2006). The Legal and Ethical Implications of Therapeutic Privilege – is It Ever Justified to Withhold Treatment Information From a Competent Patient? Clinical Ethics 1 (3):146-151.
C. Richard, Y. Lajeunesse & M. -T. Lussier (2010). Therapeutic Privilege: Between the Ethics of Lying and the Practice of Truth. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (6):353-357.
Douglas C. Long (2001). Avowals and First-Person Privilege. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (2):311 - 335.
Sonia Kruks (2005). Simone de Beauvoir and the Politics of Privilege. Hypatia 20 (1):178-205.
Jennifer Evans Marsh (2003). Empirical Support for the United States Supreme Court's Protection of the Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege. Ethics and Behavior 13 (4):385 – 400.
K. Brad Wray (2012). Epistemic Privilege and the Success of Science. Noûs 46 (3):375-385.
Adam La Caze (2008). Evidence-Based Medicine Can't Be…. Social Epistemology 22 (4):353 – 370.
Alison Bailey (1998). Privilege: Expanding on Marilyn Frye's Oppression. Journal of Social Philosophy 29 (3):104-119.
Alison Bailey (1998). Locating Traitorous Identities: Toward a View of Privilege-Cognizant White Character. Hypatia 13 (3):27 - 42.
Alison Bailey (1999). Despising an Identity They Taught Me to Claim. In Chris J. Cuomo & Kim Q. Hall (eds.), WHITENESS: FEMINIST PHILOSOPHICAL NARRATIVES.
Added to index2012-02-29
Total downloads10 ( #114,394 of 734,603 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 734,603 )
How can I increase my downloads?