David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (5):415-431 (2006)
In genomic research the ideal standard of free, informed, prior, and explicit consent is believed to restrict important research studies. For certain types of genomic research other forms of consent are therefore proposed which are ethically justified by an appeal to the common good. This notion is often used in a general sense and this forms a weak basis for the use of weaker forms of consent. Here we examine how the notion of the common good can be related to individual health, health care, and genomic research and we use this analysis to propose more precise criteria to justify forms of consent which diverge from the ideal standard.
|Keywords||Genomics genomic research informed consent public intersest common good|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Charles Taylor (1995). Philosophical Arguments. Harvard University Press.
Ingmar Pörn (1993). Health and Adaptedness. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (4).
Alex John London (2003). Threats to the Common Good: Biochemical Weapons and Human Subjects Research. Hastings Center Report 33 (5):17-25.
C. Trouet (2004). New European Guidelines for the Use of Stored Human Biological Materials in Biomedical Research. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (1):99-103.
Caroline Whitbeck (1981). A Theory of Health. In Arthur L. Caplan, H. Tristram Engelhardt & James J. McCartney (eds.), Concepts of Health and Disease: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Addison-Wesley, Advanced Book Program/World Science Division 611--626.
Citations of this work BETA
Margit Sutrop (2011). Changing Ethical Frameworks: From Individual Rights to the Common Good? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (04):533-545.
Kadri Simm (2011). The Concepts of Common Good and Public Interest: From Plato to Biobanking. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (04):554-562.
Luciana Caenazzo, Pamela Tozzo & Renzo Pegoraro (2013). Biobanking Research on Oncological Residual Material: A Framework Between the Rights of the Individual and the Interest of Society. [REVIEW] BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):17.
Similar books and articles
Asya Al-Riyami, Deepali Jaju, Sanjay Jaju & Henry J. Silverman (2011). The Adequacy of Informed Consent Forms in Genetic Research in Oman: A Pilot Study. Developing World Bioethics 11 (2):57-62.
Dave Wendler (2000). Informed Consent, Exploitation and Whether It is Possible to Conduct Human Subjects Research Without Either One. Bioethics 14 (4):310–339.
M. Sheehan (2011). Can Broad Consent Be Informed Consent? Public Health Ethics 4 (3):226-235.
Carl E. Schneider (2010). The Hydra. Hastings Center Report 40 (4):9-11.
Bette Jacobs, Jason Roffenbender, Jeff Collmann, Kate Cherry, LeManuel Lee Bitsói, Kim Bassett & Charles H. Evans (2010). Bridging the Divide Between Genomic Science and Indigenous Peoples. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 38 (3):684-696.
C. Simon, L. A. Shinkunas, D. Brandt & J. K. Williams (2012). Individual Genetic and Genomic Research Results and the Tradition of Informed Consent: Exploring US Review Board Guidance. Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (7):417-422.
James R. P. Ogloff & Randy K. Otto (1991). Are Research Participants Truly Informed? Readability of Informed Consent Forms Used in Research. Ethics and Behavior 1 (4):239 – 252.
Rogeer Hoedemaekers, Bert Gordijn & Martien Pijnenburg (2007). Solidarity and Justice as Guiding Principles in Genomic Research. Bioethics 21 (6):342–350.
Gordon R. Mitchell (2001). Defining the Subject of Consent in DNA Research. Journal of Medical Humanities 22 (1):41-53.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #115,657 of 1,907,521 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #42,510 of 1,907,521 )
How can I increase my downloads?