David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (3):287-335 (1994)
The story of Einstein's struggle to create a general theory of relativity, and his early discontentment with the final form of the theory , is well known in broad outline. Thanks to the work of John Norton and others, much of the fine detail of the story is also now known. One aspect of Einstein's work in this period has, however, been relatively neglected: Einstein's commitment to Mach's ideas on inertia, and the influence this commitment had on Einstein's work on general relativity from 1907 to 1918. In this paper published writings and archival material are examined, to try to reconstruct the details of Einstein's thinking about inertia and gravitation, and the role that Mach's ideas played in Einstein's crucial work on the general theory. By the end, a clear picture of Einstein's conceptions of Mach's ideas on inertia, and their philosophical motivations, will emerge. Several surprising conclusions also emerge: Einstein's desire for a Machian gravitation theory was the central force driving his work from 1912 to 1915, keeping him going despite numerous frustrating setbacks; Einstein's continued commitment to Mach's ideas in 1916–1917 kept him at work trying various strategies of modification of the field equations, in order to exclude anti-Machian solutions ; and as late as early 1918, Einstein was ready to call the whole General Theory a failure if no way of squaring it with Mach's ideas on inertia could be found. But by 1920 Einstein advocated a view that granted spacetime independent existence with physical qualities of its own, a complete break with his earlier Machian views
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Tim Maudlin (1990). Substances and Space-Time: What Aristotle Would Have Said to Einstein. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 21 (4):531--61.
John Norton (1985). What Was Einstein's Principle of Equivalence? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 16 (3):203-246.
Christopher Ray (1990). The Cosmological Constant: Einstein's Greatest Mistake? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (4):589-604.
Citations of this work BETA
Claus Beisbart (2009). Can We Justifiably Assume the Cosmological Principle in Order to Break Model Underdetermination in Cosmology? Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40 (2):175 - 205.
Dennis Lehmkuhl (2014). Why Einstein Did Not Believe That General Relativity Geometrizes Gravity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 46 (2):316-326.
C. Hoefer (2000). Energy Conservation in GTR. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 31 (2):187-199.
Carl Hoefer (2014). Mach׳s Principle as Action-at-a-Distance in GR: The Causality Question. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 48:128-136.
Giora Hon (1996). Disturbing, but Not Surprising: Did Gödel Surprise Einstein with a Rotating Universe and Time Travel? [REVIEW] Foundations of Physics 26 (4):501-521.
Similar books and articles
John D. Norton (2007). Einstein, Nordstrom, and the Early Demise of Scalar, Lorentz Covariant Theories of Gravitation. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 250 (3).
Arthur Stanley Eddington (1920/1966). Space, Time, and Gravitation: An Outline of the General Relativity Theory. Cambridge [Eng.]University Press.
Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (2001). Indeterminism, Classical Gravitation and Non-Collision Singularities. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15 (3):269 – 274.
V. A. Fok (1964). The Theory of Space, Time and Gravitation. New York, Macmillan.
Tullio Levi-Civita (1929). A Simplified Presentation of Einstein's Unified Field Equations. London, Blackie.
Jeremy Butterfield (2002). Critical Notice. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (2):289-330.
R. M. Nugayev (1987). The Genesis and Structure of Models in the Modern Theory of Gravity. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2 (1):84 – 104.
Jonathan Bain (1998). Whitehead's Theory of Gravity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 29 (4):547-574.
Jeroen van Dongen (2010). Einstein's Unification. Cambridge University Press.
Steven Gimbel (2012). Einstein's Jewish Science: Physics at the Intersection of Politics and Religion. Johns Hopkins University Press.
John F. Kiley (1970). Einstein and Aquinas: A Rapprochement. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff.
Tauno Mannila (1973). Planetary Gravitation and History. Distributor, Akateeminen Kirjaksuppa.
Peter Gabriel Bergmann (1969). The Riddle of Gravitation. London, J. Murray.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads20 ( #181,423 of 1,792,834 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #282,371 of 1,792,834 )
How can I increase my downloads?