David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Noûs 39 (2):256–283 (2005)
Ontology is the philosophical discipline that tries to find out what there is: what entities make up reality, what is the stuff the world is made from? Thus, ontology is part of metaphysics, and in fact it seems to be about half of all of metaphysics. It tries to establish what (kinds of) things there are, the other half tries to find out what the (general) properties of these things are and what (general) relations they have to each other. Settling questions in ontology would bring with it major progress in metaphysics. And it would bring with it major progress in a variety of areas in philosophy outside of metaphysics as well. Many philosophical debates outside of metaphysics are quite directly influenced by how things turn out in ontology. Whether or not there are certain entities will give rise to quite different answers in various philosophical debates. I would like to very briefly describe three debates where ontological questions play a central role. These debates are either directly from metaphysics or from other areas of philosophy and they will be of central importance throughout this paper.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Hartry Field (1989). Realism, Mathematics & Modality. Basil Blackwell.
Rudolf Carnap (1947/1956). Meaning and Necessity. University of Chicago Press.
Willard Orman Quine (1953/1980). From a Logical Point of View. Harvard University Press.
Mary Dalrymple, Makoto Kanazawa, Yookyung Kim, Sam McHombo & Stanley Peters (1998). Reciprocal Expressions and the Concept of Reciprocity. Linguistics and Philosophy 21 (2):159-210.
Citations of this work BETA
Berit Brogaard (2008). Moral Contextualism and Moral Relativism. Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):385 - 409.
Tristan Haze (2015). A Problem for Hofweber’s Ontological Project. Philosophia 43 (3):843-846.
Peter Hanks (2009). Recent Work on Propositions. Philosophy Compass 4 (3):469-486.
Thomas Hofweber (2009). The Meta-Problem of Change. Noûs 43 (2):286 - 314.
Berit Brogaard (2007). Number Words and Ontological Commitment. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (226):1–20.
Similar books and articles
Chris Brink & Ingrid Rewitzky (2002). Three Dual Ontologies. Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (6):543-568.
Joseph Kaipayil (2008). An Essay on Ontology. Kochi: Karunikan Books.
Barry Smith (2003). Ontology. In Luciano Floridi (ed.), Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information. Blackwell 155-166.
Thomas Hofweber, Logic and Ontology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Joseph Kaipayil (2002). Critical Ontology: An Introductory Essay. Bangalore: Jeevalaya Institute of Philosophy.
Achille C. Varzi (2011). On Doing Ontology Without Metaphysics. Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):407-423.
Thomas Hofweber (1999). Ontology and Objectivity. Dissertation, Stanford University
Hans-Johann Glock (2002). Does Ontology Exist? Philosophy 77 (2):235-260.
István Aranyosi (2007). Shadows of Constitution. The Monist 90 (3):415-431.
Thomas Hofweber (2005). A Puzzle About Ontology. Noûs 39 (2):256-283.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads68 ( #60,791 of 1,792,980 )
Recent downloads (6 months)16 ( #48,236 of 1,792,980 )
How can I increase my downloads?