David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In David John Chalmers, David Manley & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press. 260--289 (2009)
There is a long history of worrying about whether or not metaphysics is a legitimate philosophical discipline. Traditionally such worries center around issues of meaning and epistemological concerns. Do the metaphysical questions have any meaning? Can metaphysical methodology lead to knowledge? But these questions are, in my opinion, not as serious as they have sometimes (historically) been taken to be. What is much more concerning is another set of worries about metaphysics, which I take to the greatest threat to metaphysics as a philosophical discipline. These worries, in effect, hold that the questions that metaphysics tries to answer have long been answered in other parts of inquiry, ones that have much greater authority. And if they haven’t been answered yet then one should not look to philosophy for an answer. What metaphysics tries to do has been or will be done by the sciences. There is nothing left to do for philosophy, or so the worry. Let me illustrate this with two examples, one of which is our main concern here.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Michael J. Raven (2012). In Defence of Ground. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4):687 - 701.
Peter Schulte (2014). Can Truthmaker Theorists Claim Ontological Free Lunches? European Journal of Philosophy 22 (2):249-268.
Meghan Sullivan (2012). The Minimal A-Theory. Philosophical Studies 158 (2):149-174.
Jonas Rafael Becker Arenhart (2013). Wither Away Individuals. Synthese 190 (16):3475-3494.
Similar books and articles
Peter van Inwagen, Metaphysics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
E. J. Lowe (2002). A Survey of Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
Peter Godfrey-Smith (2006). Theories and Models in Metaphysics. The Harvard Review of Philosophy 14 (1):4-19.
Thomas Hofweber (2005). A Puzzle About Ontology. Noûs 39 (2):256-283.
Thomas Hofweber (2005). A Puzzle About Ontology. Noûs 39 (2):256–283.
Thomas Hofweber (2009). The Meta-Problem of Change. Noûs 43 (2):286 - 314.
E. J. Lowe (1998). The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity, and Time. Oxford University Press.
Antony Eagle, Can We Read Metaphysics Off Physics? Or, What Presentists Should Say About Special Relativity.
Tuomas E. Tahko (2008). The Metaphysical Status of Logic. In Michal Peliš (ed.), The Logica Yearbook 2007. Filosofia.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads72 ( #18,389 of 1,096,612 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #30,160 of 1,096,612 )
How can I increase my downloads?