Bell(δ) Inequalities Derived from Separate Common Causal Explanation of Almost Perfect EPR Anticorrelations
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Foundations of Physics 41 (8):1398-1413 (2011)
It is a well known fact that a common common causal explanation of the EPR scenario which consists in providing a local, non-conspiratorial common common cause system for a set of EPR correlations is excluded by various Bell inequalities. But what if we replace the assumption of a common common cause system by the requirement that each correlation of the set has a local, non-conspiratorial separate common cause system? In the paper we show that this move does not yield a solution by providing a general recipe how to derive any Bell(δ) inequality—that is an inequality differing from some Bell inequality in a term of order of δ—from the assumption that an appropriate set of almost perfect anticorrelations has a separate common causal explanation
|Keywords||Common cause EPR correlation Bell inequality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
J. Berkovitz (1995). What Econometrics Cannot Teach Quantum Mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 26 (2):163-200.
Tomasz Placek (2000). Stochastic Outcomes in Branching Space-Time: Analysis of Bell's Theorem. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (3):445-475.
Chrysovalantis Stergiou (2012). Two Comments on the Common Cause Principle in Algebraic Quantum Field Theory. In Henk W. de Regt (ed.), Epsa Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer 387--402.
Andrew Elby (1993). Why Local Realistic Theories Violate, Nontrivially, the Quantum Mechanical EPR Perfect Correlations. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (2):213-230.
Gerd Graßhoff, Samuel Portmann & and Adrian Wüthrich (2005). Minimal Assumption Derivation of a Bell-Type Inequality. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):663 - 680.
Iñaki San Pedro (2012). Causation, Measurement Relevance and No-Conspiracy in EPR. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):137-156.
Iñaki San Pedro (2011). Causation, Measurement Relevance and No-Conspiracy in EPR. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2.
Gábor Hofer-Szabó (2007). Separate- Versus Common -Common-Cause-Type Derivations of the Bell Inequalities. Synthese 163 (2):199 - 215.
Added to index2010-05-28
Total downloads107 ( #18,763 of 1,707,724 )
Recent downloads (6 months)22 ( #39,094 of 1,707,724 )
How can I increase my downloads?