Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):415-416 (2003)
|Abstract||Vision scientists standardly assume that the goal of vision is to recover properties of the external world. Lehar's “miniature, virtual-reality replica of the external world inside our head” (target article, sect. 10) is an example of this assumption. I propose instead, on evolutionary grounds, that the goal of vision is simply to provide a useful user interface to the external world.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Panayot K. Butchvarov (1998). Skepticism About the External World. New York: Oxford University Press.
Naomi M. Eilan (1993). Molyneux's Question and the Idea of an External World. In Spatial Representation. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Martin Smith (2011). God and the External World. Ratio 24 (1):65-77.
J. E. Tiles (1988). Our Perception of the External World. Philosophy 24:15-19.
Steven Lehar (2003). The World in Your Head: A Gestalt View of the Mechanism of Conscious Experience. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Steven Lehar, The Function of Conscious Experience: An Analogical Paradigm of Perception and Behavior.
Don Locke (1967). Perception And Our Knowledge Of The External World. Ny: Humanities Press.
Athanasios P. Fotinis (1974). Perception and the External World: A Historical and Critical Account. Philosophia 4:433-448.
Ram Neta (2003). Contextualism and the Problem of the External World. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1):1–31.
Brad J. Thompson (2010). The Spatial Content of Experience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (1):146-184.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #122,430 of 723,182 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 723,182 )
How can I increase my downloads?