Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||The semantics of noun phrases (NPs) is of crucial importance for both philosophy and linguistics. Throughout much of the history of the debate about the semantics of noun phrases there has been an implicit assumption about how they are to be understood. Basically, it is the assumption that NPs come only in two kinds. In this paper we would like to make that assumption explicit and discuss it and its status in the semantics of natural language. We will have a look at how the assumption is to be understood more precisely, what its methodological status should be, whether it has been abandoned in recent work in semantics, and whether it should be abandoned in future work. To do all this, it’s best to start with some historical context.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Anna Szabolcsi (1997). Introduction to Ways of Scope Taking. In , Ways of Scope Taking. Kluwer.
Ernest Lepore & Kirk Ludwig (2000). The Semantics and Pragmatics of Complex Demonstratives. Mind 109 (434):199-240.
Kari Fraurud (1990). Definiteness and the Processing of Noun Phrases in Natural Discourse. Journal of Semantics 7 (4):395-433.
Kirk Ludwig (2000). The Semantics and Pragmatics of Complex Demonstratives. Mind 109 (434):199 - 240.
R. Breheny (2007). A New Look at the Semantics and Pragmatics of Numerically Quantified Noun Phrases. Journal of Semantics 25 (2):93-139.
Irene Heim (1982). The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Dissertation, UMass Amherst
Peter Lasersohn (1989). On the Readings of Plural Noun Phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 20 (1):130-134.
John Justice (2007). Unified Semantics of Singular Terms. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (228):363–373.
Added to index2009-03-19
Total downloads33 ( #42,201 of 755,113 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,366 of 755,113 )
How can I increase my downloads?