How to analyse substance: A reply to Schnieder
Ratio 20 (1):130–141 (2007)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesPatrick Toner (forthcoming). Independence Accounts of Substance and Substantial Parts. Philosophical Studies.
Benjamin Schnieder (2006). A Certain Kind of Trinity: Dependence, Substance, Explanation. Philosophical Studies 129 (2):393 - 419.
Daniel von Wachter (2007). God as Substance Without Substance Ontology. In Christian Kanzian & Muhammed Legenhausen (eds.), Substance and Attribute: Western and Islamic Traditions in Dialogue.
Joshua D. Crabill (2013). Suppose Yalcin is Wrong About Epistemic Modals. Philosophical Studies 162 (3):625-635.
Réjane Bernier & Paul Pirlot (1980). Analyse de l'Analyse (de F.D.) de l'Analyse (de R.B. Et P.P.) de l'Analyse (Fonctionnelle). Dialogue 19 (02):278-286.
Joshua Hoffman (1994). Substance Among Other Categories. Cambridge University Press.
Gary Rosenkrantz & Joshua Hoffman (1991). The Independence Criterion of Substance. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (4):835-853.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads21 ( #58,806 of 550,917 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 550,917 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
