Improving Health Care Outcomes through Personalized Comparisons of Treatment Effectiveness Based on Electronic Health Records
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):425-436 (2011)
|Abstract||Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is one of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's significant initiatives that aims to improve treatment outcomes and lower health care costs. This article takes CER a step further and suggests a novel clinical application for it. The article proposes the development of a national framework to enable physicians to rapidly perform, through a computerized service, medically sound personalized comparisons of the effectiveness of possible treatments for patients' conditions. A treatment comparison for a given patient would be based on data from electronic health records of a cohort of clinically similar patients who received the treatments previously and whose outcomes were recorded. This framework has unique potential to simultaneously improve the quality of health care, reduce its cost, and alleviate public concerns about rationing and “one size fits all” medicine|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Richard S. Saver (2011). The New Era of Comparative Effectiveness: Will Public Health End Up Left Behind? Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):437-449.
John Aloysius Cogan (2011). The Affordable Care Act's Preventive Services Mandate: Breaking Down the Barriers to Nationwide Access to Preventive Services. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):355-365.
Greg Bognar (2011). Impartiality and Disability Discrimination. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 21 (1):1-23.
Lorian E. Hardcastle, Katherine L. Record, Peter D. Jacobson & Lawrence O. Gostin (2011). Improving the Population's Health: The Affordable Care Act and the Importance of Integration. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):317-327.
Gavin Mooney (1989). The Demand for Effectiveness, Efficiency and Equity of Health Care. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 10 (3).
Lars Bernfort (2003). Decisions on Inclusion in the Swedish Basic Health Care Package—Roles of Cost-Effectiveness and Need. Health Care Analysis 11 (4):301-308.
Lucy Frith (1999). Priority Setting and Evidence Based Purchasing. Health Care Analysis 7 (2):139-151.
Joshua Cohen & Edwige Burg (2003). On the Possibility of a Positive-Sum Game in the Distribution of Health Care Resources. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (3):327 – 338.
William H. Bruening (1992). Autonomy and Futility. HEC Forum 4 (5):305-313.
Reider K. Lie (1993). Methodological and Conceptual Issues in Health Care System Comparisons: Canada, Norway, and the United States. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (5):437-463.
Pythagoras Petratos (2005). Does the Private Finance Initiative Promote Innovation in Health Care? The Case of the British National Health Service. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (6):627 – 642.
John D. Stobo (1997). Who Should Manage Care? The Case for Providers. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (4):387-389.
Robert A. Pearlman (1992). An Ethical Framework for Rationing Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (1):79-96.
David A. Gruenewald (2012). Can Health Care Rationing Ever Be Rational? Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (1):17-25.
Added to index2011-08-23
Total downloads5 ( #169,941 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?