Metametaphysics and Substance: Two Case Studies [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Axiomathes 21 (4):491-505 (2011)
|Abstract||This paper examines an often-ignored aspect of the evaluation of metaphysical analyses, namely, their ontological commitments. Such evaluations are part of metaphysical methodology, and reflection on this methodology is itself part of metametaphysics. I will develop a theory for assessing what these commitments are, and then I will apply it to an important historical and an important contemporary metaphysical analysis of the concept of an individual substance (i.e., an object, or thing). I claim that in evaluating metaphysical analyses, we should not only rule out counterexamples, but also compare them with respect to their ontological commitments, and we should hold that if they are comparable in other respects, then an analysis with fewer such commitments is preferable to one with more (There is, of course, a connection between counterexamples and ontological commitments. If the existence or possible existence of something one is committed to the existence or possible existence of is incompatible with an analysis, then one should reject that analysis as inadequate to the data. On the other hand, if one is uncertain about the existence or possible existence of something that is incompatible with an analysis, then while this does not refute the analysis for one, it raises doubts about it. The fewer such doubts are raised by an analysis, the better it is.)|
|Keywords||Aristotle Substance Metametaphysics Ontology Ontological commitments E. J. LOWE Philosophical analysis|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jamin Asay (2010). How to Express Ontological Commitment in the Vernacular. Philosophia Mathematica 18 (3):293-310.
Joshua Hoffman (1994). Substance Among Other Categories. Cambridge University Press.
Patrick Dieveney (2008). Ontological Infidelity. Synthese 165 (1):1 - 12.
Christopher Mole (2009). Fiction's Ontological Commitments. Philosophical Forum 40 (4):473-488.
Phil Corkum (forthcoming). Substance and Independence in Aristotle. In B. Schnieder, A. Steinberg & M. Hoeltje (eds.), Ontological Dependence, Supervenience, and Response-Dependence. Basic Philosophical Concepts Series, Philosophia Verlag.
J. Moore (2003). Some Further Thoughts on the Pragmatic and Behavioral Conception of Private Events. Behavior and Philosophy 31:151 - 157.
David A. Denby (2007). A Note on Analysing Substancehood. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):473 – 484.
Eric D. Smaw (2008). An Analysis of the Philosophy of Universal Human Rights: Hobbes, Locke, and Ignatieff. International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (1):39-58.
Kanu Ikechukwu Anthony (2012). The Problem of Substance in Metaphysics. African Research Review 1 (1):24-29.
Martin Lin (2007). Spinoza's Arguments for the Existence of God. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):269-297.
A. Hoffmann (2012). Are Propositions Sets of Possible Worlds? Analysis 72 (3):449-455.
Added to index2010-11-18
Total downloads54 ( #22,727 of 752,081 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,163 of 752,081 )
How can I increase my downloads?