Review of Michael J. Almeida, The Metaphysics of Perfect Beings
Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (3) (2009)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMichael J. Almeida (2006). On Stone's Evidential Atheism. Theoria 72 (1):5-22.
Michael Rea (2005). In Defence of Sceptical Theism: A Reply to Almeida and Oppy. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (2):241-251.
Michael J. Almeida (2000). Why We Ought to Be a Little Less Beneficent. Analysis 60 (265):97–106.
Michael Bergmann & Michael Rea (2005). In Defence of Sceptical Theism: A Reply to Almeida and Oppy. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (2):241 – 251.
Val Dusek (2010). Review of Michael Eldred, The Digital Cast of Being: Metaphysics, Mathematics, Cartesianism, Cybernetics, Capitalism, Communication. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (6).
Michael Stocker (1967). Acts, Perfect Duties, and Imperfect Duties. The Review of Metaphysics 20 (3):507 - 517.
Mark C. Murphy (2004). Reply to Almeida. Religious Studies 40 (3):335-339.
Michael Almeida (2005). On Infinitely Improving Worlds. Philo 8 (1):38-46.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-04-30Total downloads19 ( #64,337 of 549,067 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,067 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
