The Distinction between Nature and Will in Duns Scotus
Archives D’Histoire Doctrinale Et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 66:189-224 (1999)
| Abstract | The distinction of active potencies into will and nature is one of the most characteristic traits of Duns Scotus’s thought. Scotus distinguishes free and self-determining causality from natural and necessary causality. In this article I show how this distinction underlies large parts of his moral psychology, ethics, metaphysics, and Trinitarian theology. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesTobias Hoffmann (2010). Duns Scotus’s Action Theory in the Context of His Angelology. In Ludger Honnefelder (ed.), Johannes Duns Scotus 1308–2008: Die philosophischen Perspektiven seines Werkes / Investigations into his Philosophy. Proceedings of “The Quadruple Congress” on John Duns Scotus, part 3. Franciscan Institute Publications; Aschendorff.
Richard Cross (1999). Duns Scotus. Oxford University Press.
Cruz González-Ayesta (2007). Scotus's Interpretation of Metaphysics 9.2. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:217-230.
Charles Reginald Schiller Harris (1927). Duns Scotus. Oxford, the Clarendon Press.
Garrett Smith (2010). Bibliotheca Manuscripta Petri Thomae. Bulletin de Philosophie Medievale 52:161-200.
Stephen D. Dumont (2005). Duns Scotus's Parisian Question on the Formal Distinction. Vivarium 43 (1):7-62.
Richard Cross (2010). Recent Work on the Philosophy of Duns Scotus. Philosophy Compass 5 (8):667-675.
Richard Cross (1998). The Physics of Duns Scotus: The Scientific Context of a Theological Vision. Clarendon Press.
Colin Connors (2009). Scotus and Ockham. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:141-153.
Richard Cross (2012). Duns Scotus and Analogy. The Modern Schoolman 89 (3-4):147-154.
Calvin G. Normore (2003). Duns Scotus' Modal Theory. In Thomas Williams (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus. Cambridge Up.
Ludger Honnefelder (ed.) (2010). Johannes Duns Scotus 1308–2008: Die Philosophischen Perspektiven Seines Werkes / Investigations Into His Philosophy. Proceedings of “The Quadruple Congress” on John Duns Scotus, Part 3. [REVIEW] Franciscan Institute Publications; Aschendorff.
Michael D. Robinson (2009). Truth in Metaphysics. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (4):467-490.
Tobias Hoffmann (2011). Henry of Ghent's Influence on John Duns Scotus's Metaphysics. In Gordon A. Wilson (ed.), The Brill Companion to Henry of Ghent. Brill.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
