David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (1):17-29 (2002)
Technology is believed to have liberated health care from dogmas, myths and speculations of earlier times. However, we are accused of using technology in an excessive, futile and even detrimental way, as if technology is compelling our actions. It appears to be like the monster threatening Dr. Frankenstein or like the socerer’s broom in the hand of the apprentice. That is, the same technology that should liberate us from myths, appears to be mythical. The objective of this article is to investigate the background for the re-entrance of the myth: How we encounter it and how we can explain it. The main point is that a myth of technology is normative: it relates ‘is’ and ‘ought’ and directs our actions. This becomes particularly clear in health care. Hence, if there is a myth of technology, it is an ethical issue, and should be taken seriously.
|Keywords||myth technology ethics body technological imperative|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Don Ihde (1990). Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Indiana University Press.
Eric J. Cassell (1993). The Sorcerer's Broom. Hastings Center Report 23 (6):32-39.
Jacques Ellul (1964). The Technological Society. New York, Knopf.
Carl Mitcham (1994). Thinking Through Technology: The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Bjørn Hofmann (2003). Technological Paternalism: On How Medicine has Reformed Ethics and How Technology Can Refine Moral Theory. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (3):343-352.
Bjørn Hofmann (2005). Simplified Models of the Relationship Between Health and Disease. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (5):355-377.
Stephanie J. Bird (2002). Science and Technology for the Good of Society? Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (1):3-4.
Andreas Stylianou & Michael A. Talias (2015). The ‘Magic Light’: A Discussion on Laser Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (4):979-998.
Similar books and articles
Robert A. Pearlman (1992). An Ethical Framework for Rationing Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (1):79-96.
Ingrid Witters & Jean-Pierre Fryns (2002). Economics and Ethics in Health Care: Where Can They Meet? / Elly Stolk, Jan Busschbach. Clinical Aspects of Prenatal Diagnosis. In Chris Gastmans (ed.), Between Technology and Humanity: The Impact of Technology on Health Care Ethics. Leuven University Press
Elin Palm (2013). Who Cares? Moral Obligations in Formal and Informal Care Provision in the Light of ICT-Based Home Care. Health Care Analysis 21 (2):171-188.
Bjørn Hofmann (2002). Technological Medicine and the Autonomy of Man. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (2):157-167.
Herman de Dijn (2002). Technologies in Health Care: A Philosophical-Ethical Appraisal. In Chris Gastmans (ed.), Between Technology and Humanity: The Impact of Technology on Health Care Ethics. Leuven University Press
Bjørn Hofmann (2001). On the Value-Ladenness of Technology in Medicine. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (3):335-345.
Guy Widdershoven (2002). Technology and Care: From Opposition to Integration. In Chris Gastmans (ed.), Between Technology and Humanity: The Impact of Technology on Health Care Ethics. Leuven University Press
Bjørn Hofmann (2005). On Value-Judgements and Ethics in Health Technology Assessment. Poiesis and Praxis 3 (4):277-295.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #214,064 of 1,902,212 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #96,938 of 1,902,212 )
How can I increase my downloads?