Technological paternalism: On how medicine has reformed ethics and how technology can refine moral theory
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (3):343-352 (2003)
The objective of this article is to investigate ethical aspects of technology through the moral term “paternalism”. The field of investigation is medicine. The reason for this is twofold. Firstly, “paternalism” has gained moral relevance through modern medicine, where physicians have been accused of behaving paternalistic and threatening patients’ autonomy. Secondly, medicine is a brilliant area to scrutinise the evaluative aspects of technology. It is argued that paternalism is a morally relevant term for the ethics of technology, but that its traditional conception is not adequate to address the challenges of modern technology. A modification towards a “technological paternalism” is necessary. That is, “technological paternalism” is a fruitful term in the ethics of technology. Moreover, it is suited to point out the deficiencies of the traditional concept of paternalism and to reform and vitalise the conception of paternalism in ethics in order to handle the challenges of technology.
|Keywords||paternalism technology ethics medicine|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Eric J. Cassell (2004). The Nature of Suffering and the Goals of Medicine. Oxford University Press.
John Stuart Mill (1999). On Liberty. Broadview Press.
Gerald Dworkin, Paternalism. The Monist.
Joel Feinberg (1986). Harm to Self. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Eric J. Cassell (1993). The Sorcerer's Broom. Hastings Center Report 23 (6):32-39.
Citations of this work BETA
E. R. Koppelman-White (2009). The Search for Reasons in a Unified Relationship. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (5):447-469.
Bette Anton (2008). CQ Sources/Bibliography. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (2).
Bette Anton (1999). CQ Sources/Bibliography. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (4):348-350.
Similar books and articles
Simon Clarke (2002). A Definition of Paternalism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 5 (1):81-91.
Sarah Spiekermann & Frank Pallas (2006). Technology Paternalism – Wider Implications of Ubiquitous Computing. Poiesis and Praxis 4 (1):6-18.
Pak-Hang Wong (2013). Technology, Recommendation and Design: On Being a 'Paternalistic' Philosopher. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):27-42.
Thomas Nys, Yvonne Denier & T. Vandevelde (eds.) (2007). Autonomy & Paternalism: Reflections on the Theory and Practice of Health Care. Peeters.
Paul Turner Hershey (1985). A Definition for Paternalism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (2):171-182.
Bjørn Hofmann (2001). On the Value-Ladenness of Technology in Medicine. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (3):335-345.
Franklin G. Miller & Alan Wertheimer (2007). Facing Up to Paternalism in Research Ethics. Hastings Center Report 37 (3):24-34.
Carson Strong (1984). Paternalism in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (1).
David Crossley (1999). Paternalism and Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 21 (4):291 - 302.
Bjørn Hofmann (2002). Technological Medicine and the Autonomy of Man. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (2):157-167.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #135,355 of 1,902,050 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #97,117 of 1,902,050 )
How can I increase my downloads?