Voluntariness, Choice, and Will in the Ethics Commentaries of Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas
Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 17:71-92 (2006)
|Abstract||The article studies the reception of Aristotle’s treatments of voluntariness and decision (EN 3.1–5) in the first three Latin commentaries (two by Albert the Great, one by Thomas Aquinas) that are based on the integral text of the Nicomachean Ethics. In particular, my goal is to examine how Albert’s and Thomas’s non-Aristotelian concepts of the will as a faculty distinct from reason influences their explanations of the Aristotelian account. It is argued that the Dominican commentators emphasize the idea of freedom more than Aristotle did.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Tobias Hoffmann (2008). Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas on Magnanimity. In István Pieter Bejczy (ed.), Virtue Ethics in the Middle Ages: Commentaries on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, 1200 -1500. Brill.
Christopher Kaczor (2004). Thomas Aquinas's Commentary on the Ethics. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (3):353-378.
Jörn Müller (2008). In War and Peace : The Virtue of Courage in the Writings of Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas. In István Pieter Bejczy (ed.), Virtue Ethics in the Middle Ages: Commentaries on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, 1200 -1500. Brill.
Risto Saarinen (1994). Weakness of the Will in Medieval Thought: From Augustine to Buridan. E.J. Brill.
Michael W. Tkacz (2007). Albert the Great and the Revival of Aristotle's Zoological Research Program. Vivarium 45 (1):30-68.
Tobias Hoffmann (2003). Moral Action as Human Action: End and Object in Aquinas in Comparison with Abelard, Lombard, Albert, and Scotus. The Thomist 67:73–94.
Martin Ossikovski (2012). Some Medieval Readings of Aristotle's Argument for the Collective Superiority of “the Many”. Studia Neoaristotelica 9 (2):135-153.
M. W. F. Stone (2001). The Angelic Doctor and the Stagirite: Thomas Aquinas and Contemporary 'Aristotelian' Ethics. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (1):97–128.
Thomas (2005). Thomas Aquinas: Disputed Questions on the Virtues. Cambridge University Press.
Leo Elders (2009). The Aristotelian Commentaries of St. Thomas Aquinas. The Review of Metaphysics 63 (1):29-53.
James A. Weisheipl (2008). Thomas D'Aquino and Albert His Teacher (1980). In James P. Reilly (ed.), The Gilson Lectures on Thomas Aquinas. Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
John R. Bowlin (1999). Contingency and Fortune in Aquinas's Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Matthias Perkams (2008). Aquinas's Interpretation of the Aristotelian Virtue of Justice and His Doctrine of Natural Law. In István Pieter Bejczy (ed.), Virtue Ethics in the Middle Ages: Commentaries on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, 1200 -1500. Brill.
John F. Wippel (2003). Norman Kretzmann on Aquinas's Attribution of Will and of Freedom to Create to God. Religious Studies 39 (3):287-298.
Arthur Madigan (2005). Commentaries on Aristotle's “On Sense and What Is Sensed” and “On Memory and Recollection”. By Thomas Aquinas. [REVIEW] The Review of Metaphysics 59 (2):403-404.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?