Violence in Modern Philosophy
University of Chicago Press (1989)
|Abstract||Following on the arguments adumbrated in his previous works, Piotr Hoffman here argues that the notion of and concern with violence are not limited to political philosophy but in fact form the essential component of philosophy in general. The acute awareness of the ever-present possibility of violence, Hoffman claims, filters into and informs ontology and epistemology in ways that require careful analysis. In his previous book, Doubt, Time, Violence , Hoffman explored the theme of violence in relation to Descartes' problematic of doubt and Heidegger's work on temporality. The pivotal notion deriving from that investigation is the notion of the other as the ultimate limit of one's powers. In effect, Hoffman argues, our practical mastery of the natural environment still leaves intact the limitation of human agents by each other. In a violent environment, the other emerges as an insurmountable obstacle to one's aims and purposes or as an inescapable danger which one is powerless to hold at bay. The other is thus the focus of an ultimate resistance to one's powers. The special status of the other, as Hoffman articulates it, is at the root of several key notions around which modern philosophy has built its problematic. Arguing here that when the theme of violence is taken into account many conceptual tensions and puzzles receive satisfying solutions, Hoffman traces the theme through the issue of things versus properties; through Kant's treatment of causality, necessity, and freedom in the Critique of Pure Reason; and through the early parts of Hegel's Logic. The result is a complete reorientation and reinterpretation of these important texts. Violence in Modern Philosophy offers patient and careful textual clarification in light of Hoffman's central thesis regarding the other as ultimate limit. With a high level of originality, he shows that the theme of violence is the hidden impulse behind much of modern philosophy. Hoffman's unique stress on the constitutive importance of violence also offers a challenge to the dominant "compatibilist" tradition in moral and political theory. Of great interest to all philosophers, this work will also provide fresh insights to anthropologists and all those in the social sciences and humanities who occupy themselves with the general theory of culture.|
|Keywords||Violence Philosophy, Modern Knowledge, Theory of|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Buy the book||$11.98 used (74% off) $42.63 new (6% off) $42.75 direct from Amazon (5% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||B844.H65 1989|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Daniel Malotky (2012). Reinhold Niebuhr's Paradox: Paralysis, Violence, and Pragmatism. Lexington Books.
Adrian Little (2006). Theorizing Democracy and Violence: The Case of Northern Ireland. Theoria 53 (111):62-86.
Manfred S. Frings (1990). Violence. Philosophy and Theology 5 (1):65-72.
Vinit Haksar (2012). Violence in a Spirit of Love: Gandhi and the Limits of Non-Violence. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (3):303-324.
Bat-Ami Bar On (2002). The Subject of Violence: Arendtean Exercises in Understanding. Rowman and Littlefield.
Cécile Lavergne (2011). Questioning the Moral Justification of Political Violence: Recognition Conflicts, Identities and Emancipation. Critical Horizons 12 (2):211-231.
Piotr Hoffman (1996). The Quest for Power: Hobbes, Descartes, and the Emergence of Modernity. Humanities Press.
Johanna Oksala (2012). Foucault, Politics, and Violence. Northwestern University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?