A rose by any other name... Is the research / non-research distinction still important and relevant?
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (3):153-155 (2007)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesR. E. Lawrence & F. A. Curlin (2011). The Rise of Empirical Research in Medical Ethics: A MacIntyrean Critique and Proposal. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (2):206-216.
Niklas Egels-Zandén & Joakim Sandberg (2010). Distinctions in Descriptive and Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Challenge for Empirical Research. Business Ethics: A European Review 19 (1):35-49.
Eugenijus Gefenas (2007). Balancing Ethical Principles in Emergency Medicine Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3).
Søren Holm (2011). Withdrawing From Research: A Rethink in the Context of Research Biobanks. Health Care Analysis 19 (3):269-281.
R. J. Gatchel, Colin Allen & P. N. Fuchs (2006). Ethical Issues in Chronic Pain Research. In B. L. Gant & M. E. Schatman (eds.), Ethical Issues in Chronic Pain Management.
John D. Pringle & Donald C. Cole (forthcoming). Health Research in Complex Emergencies: A Humanitarian Imperative. Journal of Academic Ethics.
Ilkka Niiniluoto (1993). The Aim and Structure of Applied Research. Erkenntnis 38 (1):1 - 21.
Søren Holm & Lisa Bortolotti (2007). Large Scale Surveys for Policy Formation and Research–a Study in Inconsistency. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (3):205-220.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads6 ( #147,054 of 556,805 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,805 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
