Mind and Language 18 (3):286–295 (2003)
|Abstract||Lewis never saw philosophy of language as foundational in the way that many have. One of the most distinctive features of his work is the robust confidence that questions in metaphysics or mind can be addressed head on, and not through the lens of language.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Phillip Bricker (2006). David Lewis: On the Plurality of Worlds. In John Shand (ed.), Central Works of Philosophy, Vol. 5: The Twentieth Century: Quine and After. Acumen Publishing.
Margaret Gilbert (1983). Agreements, Conventions, and Language. Synthese 54 (3):375 - 407.
Stephen Laurence (2010). A Chomskian Alternative to Convention-Based Semantics. In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Arguing About Language. Routledge.
Shen-yi Liao (2012). What Are Centered Worlds? Philosophical Quarterly 62 (247):294-316.
Scott Soames (forthcoming). David Lewis's Place in Analytic Philosophy. In Barry Loewer & Jonathan Schaffer (eds.), David Lewis. Wiley.
Frank Jackson & Graham Priest (eds.) (2004). Lewisian Themes: The Philosophy of David K. Lewis. Oxford University Press.
David Lewis (1996). Elusive Knowledge. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (4):549 – 567.
Henry Jackman (1998). Convention and Language. Synthese 117 (3):295-312.
Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence (2002). Lewis's Strawman. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (206):55-65.
Max Kölbel (1998). Lewis, Language, Lust and Lies. Inquiry 41 (3):301 – 315.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads41 ( #32,645 of 722,779 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,779 )
How can I increase my downloads?