Dispositional Theories of Value Meet Moral Twin Earth

American Philosophical Quarterly 38 (2):177 - 195 (2001)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,209
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Mark LeBar (2005). Three Dogmas of Response-Dependence. Philosophical Studies 123 (3):175 - 211.
Mark Lebar (2005). Three Dogmas of Response-Dependence. Philosophical Studies 123 (3):175-211.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Katalin Farkas (2003). Does Twin Earth Rest on a Mistake? Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (8):155-169.
Neil Levy (2011). Moore on Twin Earth. Erkenntnis 75 (1):137-146.
Andrea Viggiano (2008). Ethical Naturalism and Moral Twin Earth. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (2):213 - 224.
Derek Ball (2007). Twin-Earth Externalism and Concept Possession. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):457-472.
Robert Stalnaker (1993). Twin Earth Revisited. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 63:297-311.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-05-29

Total downloads

27 ( #176,451 of 1,941,042 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #458,101 of 1,941,042 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.