David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (1):153-164 (2001)
Liberalism is the view that humans are independent, autonomous, and self-sufficient and, thus, institutional policy is warranted only when it advances these values. As an important thread in moral thought today, liberalism defines a good life as the complete freedom of all people to pursue their own desires, provided that little or no harm is done to others along the way.Moral liberalism also pervades the literature in philosophy of sport today. In this paper, I argue that liberalism as moral policy in sport is wrong because liberalism as moral policy is wrong. Human autonomy implies social responsibility, which moral liberalism today disavows. At paper’s end, I sketch out a normative account of sport, aretism, that fleshes out the types of responsibilities that bind athletes to sport, properly construed as a social institution
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Allan Bäck (2009). The Way to Virtue in Sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 36 (2):217-237.
M. Andrew Holowchak (2005). “Fascistoid” Heroism Revisited: A Deontological Twist to a Recent Debate. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 32 (1):96-104.
Similar books and articles
Michael W. Austin (2009). Magnanimity, Athletic Excellence, and Performance-Enhancing Drugs. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):46-53.
Nicholas Dixon (2007). Trash Talking, Respect for Opponents and Good Competition. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (1):96 – 106.
Jon Mahoney (2004). Public Reason and the Moral Foundation of Liberalism. Journal of Moral Philosophy 1 (3):311-331.
Léa Cléret & Mike McNamee (2012). Olympism, The Values Of Sport, and the Will to Power: De Coubertin And Nietzsche Meet Eugenio Monti. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 6 (2):183-194.
John Wilson (1990). Is Liberalism Strong Enough for a Moral Consensus? Journal of Moral Education 19 (1):24-32.
Horacio Spector (2007). Autonomy and Rights: The Moral Foundations of Liberalism. Oxford University Press.
Kenneth A. Strike (2000). Liberalism, Communitarianism and the Space Between: In Praise of Kindness. Journal of Moral Education 29 (2):133-147.
Herlinde Pauer-studer (2001). Liberalism, Perfectionism, and Civic Virtue. Philosophical Explorations 4 (3):174 – 192.
Mark G. Kuczewski (2001). The Epistemology of Communitarian Bioethics:Traditions in the Public Debates. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (2):135-150.
Gerald Doppelt (1993). The Moral Limits of Feinberg's Liberalism. Inquiry 36 (3):255 – 286.
Robert G. Osterhoudt (1973). The Philosophy of Sport: A Collection of Original Essays. Springfield, Ill.,Thomas.
John Philip Christman & Joel Anderson (eds.) (2005). Autonomy and the Challenges of Liberalism: New Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Melvyn L. Fein (2012). Post-Liberalism: The Death of a Dream. Transaction Publishers.
Alan Ryan (2007). Newer Than What? Older Than What? Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (1):1-15.
Rutger Claassen (2011). The Conservative Challenge to Liberalism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):465-485.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads26 ( #145,469 of 1,793,258 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #169,500 of 1,793,258 )
How can I increase my downloads?