Journal of Ethics 5 (4):361-384 (2001)
|Abstract||In this paper I argue that coming into existence can benefit (or harm) aperson. My argument incorporates the comparative claim that existence canbe better (or worse) for a person than never existing. Since these claimsare highly controversial, I consider and reject a number of objectionswhich threaten them. These objections raise various semantic, logical,metaphysical and value-theoretical issues. I then suggest that there is animportant sense in which it can harm (or benefit) a person not to comeinto existence. Again, I consider and reject some objections. Finally, Ibriefly consider what the conclusions reached in this paper imply for ourmoral obligations to possible future people.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Y. Nagasawa (2008). Review: David Benatar: Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming Into Existence. [REVIEW] Mind 117 (467):674-677.
David Benatar (2001). To Be or Not to Have Been? International Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (2):255-266.
Jean-Luc Nancy (1993). The Birth to Presence. Stanford University Press.
Manolito Gallegos (2011). Problems and Solutions for a Hypothetical Right Not to Exist. Logoi -- Heidelberger Graduiertenjournal für Geisteswissenschaften 1 (1):N/A.
Lynne Rudder Baker (2005). When Does a Person Begin? Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (2):25-48.
Krister Bykvist (2007). The Benefits of Coming Into Existence. Philosophical Studies 135 (3):335 - 362.
David Benatar (2006). Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming Into Existence. New York ;Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads43 ( #26,205 of 549,224 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,303 of 549,224 )
How can I increase my downloads?