Pluralism and species concepts, or when must we agree with one another?

Philosophy of Science 54 (3):480-485 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/289397

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Species concepts should not conflict with evolutionary history, but often do.Joel D. Velasco - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39 (4):407-414.
Species pluralism and anti-realism.Marc Ereshefsky - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (1):103-120.
Eliminative pluralism.Marc Ereshefsky - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (4):671-690.
For pluralism and against realism about species.P. Kyle Stanford - 1995 - Philosophy of Science 62 (1):70-91.
What SPECIES can teach us about THEORY.P. D. Magnus - manuscript
A Unified Approach to Species.John Collier - unknown
The cladistic solution to the species problem.Mark Ridley - 1989 - Biology and Philosophy 4 (1):1-16.
Species pluralism does not imply species eliminativism.Ingo Brigandt - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1305-1316.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
55 (#277,782)

6 months
6 (#417,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A (not-so-radical) solution to the species problem.Bradley E. Wilson - 1995 - Biology and Philosophy 10 (3):339-356.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Species.Philip Kitcher - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (2):308-333.
The nature of biological species.Kent E. Holsinger - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (2):293-307.

Add more references