Philosophy and Literature 20 (1):189-192 (1996)
|Abstract||This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jonathan L. Kvanvig (2009). ``Responses to Critics&Quot. In Pritchard, Haddock & Millar (eds.), Epistemic Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Review author[S.]: John R. Searle (1997). Responses to Critics of the Construction of Social Reality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (2):449-458.
Marco Mazzone (2010). Intentions in Spoken Communication. Strong and Weak Interactionist Perspectives. In M. Pettorino, F. Albano Leoni, I. Chiari, F. M. Dovetto & A. Giannini (eds.), Spoken Communication between Symbolics and Deixis. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Steve Torrance (2007). Two Conceptions of Machine Phenomenality. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (7):154-166.
R. Y. Tyrrell (1892). Sellar's Horace and the Elegiac Poets The Roman Poets of the Augustan Age, by W. Y. Sellar, M.A., LL.D., Late Professor of Humanity in the University of Edinburgh and Formerly Fellow of Oriel College, Oxford. Horace and the Elegiac Poets, with a Memoir of the Author, by Andrew Lang, M.A., and a Portrait. Oxford. Clarendon Press. 1892. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 6 (05):221-223.
Tim Crane (2004). Summary of Elements of Mind and Replies to Critics. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):223-240.
Maximilian de Gaynesford (2009). Incense and Insensibility: Austin on the 'Non-Seriousness' of Poetry. Ratio 22 (4):464-485.
M. de Gaynesford (2011). How Not To Do Things With Words: J. L. Austin on Poetry. British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (1):31-49.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #213,250 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?