The Architecture of Matter: Galileo to Kant
Oxford University Press (2004)
| Abstract | Thomas Holden presents a fascinating study of theories of matter in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. These theories were plagued by a complex of interrelated problems concerning matter's divisibility, composition, and internal architecture. Is any material body infinitely divisible? Must we posit atoms or elemental minima from which bodies are ultimately composed? Are the parts of material bodies themselves material concreta? Or are they merely potentialities or possible existents? Questions such as these -- and the press of subtler questions hidden in their amibiguities -- deeply unsettled philosophers of the early modern period. They seemed to expose serious paradoxes in the new world view pioneered by Galileo, Descartes, and Newton. The new science's account of a fundamentally geometrical Creation, mathematicizable and intelligible to the human inquirer, seemed to be under threat. This was a great scandal, and the philosophers of the period accordingly made various attempts to disarm the paradoxes. All the great figures address the issue: most famously Leibniz and Kant, but also Galileo, Hobbes, Newton, Hume, and Reid, in addition to a crowd of lesser figures. Thomas Holden offers a brilliant synthesis of these discussions and presents his own overarching interpretation of the controversy, locating the underlying problem in the tension between the early moderns' account of material parts on the one hand and the program of the geometrization of nature on the other. | |||||||||
| Keywords | Science History Matter History | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Buy the book | $91.77 new (21% off) $115.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page | |||||||||
| Call number | Q174.8.H65 2004 | |||||||||
| ISBN(s) | 0199263264 9780199263264 | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDaniel Garber & Steven Nadler (eds.) (2004). Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy Volume 1. OUP Oxford.
David Atkinson (2004). Galileo and Prior Philosophy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (1):115-136.
Michela Massimi (2011). Kant's Dynamical Theory of Matter in 1755, and its Debt to Speculative Newtonian Experimentalism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (4):525-543.
Lorenz Krüger, Thomas Sturm, Wolfgang Carl & Lorraine Daston (eds.) (2005). Why Does History Matter to Philosophy and the Sciences? Walter DeGruyter.
Douglas Michael Jesseph (2004). Galileo, Hobbes, and the Book of Nature. Perspectives on Science 12 (2):191-211.
Thomas Anand Holden (2004). Bayle and the Case for Actual Parts. Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (2):145-164.
Kurt Smith (2010). Matter Matters: Metaphysics and Methodology in the Early Modern Period. Oxford University Press.
Justin Skirry (2006). The Architecture of Matter: Galileo to Kant (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2):321-322.
Richard J. Blackwell (2005). Review of Thomas Holden, The Architecture of Matter: Galileo to Kant. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (6).
Zvi Biener (2004). Galileo's First New Science: The Science of Matter. Perspectives on Science 12 (3):262-287.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads22 ( #56,242 of 549,119 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,390 of 549,119 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
