David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
This article argues that the neoclassical era in economics has ended and is being replaced by a new era. What best characterizes the new era is its acceptance that the economy is complex, and thus that it might be called the complexity era. The complexity era has not arrived through a revolution. Instead, it has evolved out of the many strains of neoclassical work, along with work done by less orthodox mainstream and heterodox economists. It is only in its beginning stages. The article discusses the work that is forming the foundation of the complexity era, and how that work will likely change the way in which we understand economic phenomena and the economics profession
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mohammed H. I. Dore & J. Barkley Rosser, Do Nonlinear Dynamics in Economics Amount to a Kuhnian Paradigm Shift?
Edward Nik-Khah & Robert Van Horn (2012). Inland Empire: Economics Imperialism as an Imperative of Chicago Neoliberalism. Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (3):259-282.
Mark C. Taylor (2001). The Moment of Complexity: Emerging Network Culture. University of Chicago Press.
S. N. Durlauf (2012). Complexity, Economics, and Public Policy. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (1):45-75.
Arnold J. Wytenburg (2001). Bracing for the Future: Complexity and Computational Ability in the Knowledge Era. Emergence 3 (2):113-126.
Zonghao Bao & Kun Xiang (2006). Digitalization and Global Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 8 (1):41-47.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads5 ( #178,728 of 1,088,398 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,398 )
How can I increase my downloads?