David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (2):143-159 (1990)
Philosophical ethics comprises metaethics, normative ethics and applied ethics. These have characteristically received analytic treatment by twentieth-century Anglo-American philosophy. But there has been disagreement over their interrelationship to one another and the relationship of analytical ethics to substantive morality – the making of moral judgments. I contend that the expertise philosophers have in either theoretical or applied ethics does not equip them to make sounder moral judgments on the problems of bioethics than nonphilosophers. One cannot "apply" theories like Kantianism or consequentialism to get solutions to practical moral problems unless one knows which theory is correct, and that is a metaethical question over which there is no consensus. On the other hand, to presume to be able to reach solutions through neutral analysis of problems is unavoidably to beg controversial theoretical issues in the process. Thus, while analytical ethics can play an important clarificatory role in bioethics, it can neither provide, nor substitute for, moral wisdom. Keywords: abortion, applied ethics, bioethics, metaethics, normative ethics CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Karen M. Meagher (2011). Considering Virtue: Public Health and Clinical Ethics. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):888-893.
Michael C. Brannigan (1996). Designing Ethicists. Health Care Analysis 4 (3):206-218.
Edwin R. Dubose & Ronald P. Hamel (1995). Casuistry and Narrative: Of What Relevance to HECs? [REVIEW] HEC Forum 7 (4):211-227.
Carl Elliott (1991). Everything is What It Is. Inquiry 34 (4):525-538.
Similar books and articles
Tony Fitzpatrick (2008). Applied Ethics and Social Problems: Moral Questions of Birth, Society and Death. Policy Press.
Barry Hoffmaster & Cliff Hooker (2009). How Experience Confronts Ethics. Bioethics 23 (4):214-225.
I. Van De Poel & L. Royakkers (2007). The Ethical Cycle. Journal of Business Ethics 71 (1):1 - 13.
I. van de Poel & L. Royakkers (2007). The Ethical Cycle. Journal of Business Ethics 71 (1):1-13.
J. Bryan Hehir (1992). Policy Arguments in a Public Church: Catholic Social Ethics and Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (3):347-364.
Bruce Jennings (1991). Possibilities of Consensus: Toward Democratic Moral Discourse. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (4):447-463.
Massimo Reichlin (1994). Observations on the Epistemological Status of Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (1):79-102.
Laurence B. McCullough (1986). Methodological Concerns in Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (1):17-37.
Ronald M. Green (1990). Method in Bioethics: A Troubled Assessment. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (2):179-197.
Raisa Vasil'evna Korotkikh (1989). Medical Ethics: Problems of Theory and Practice. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (3):269-282.
Added to index2010-08-19
Total downloads14 ( #240,257 of 1,790,225 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #427,637 of 1,790,225 )
How can I increase my downloads?