David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Foundations of Science 9 (1):25-64 (2004)
Can a theory turn back, as it were, upon itselfand vouch for its own features? That is, canthe derived elements of a theory be the veryprimitive terms that provide thepresuppositions of the theory? This form of anall-embracing feature assumes a totality inwhich there occurs quantification over thattotality, quantification that is defined bythis very totality. I argue that the Machprinciple exhibits such a feature ofall-embracing nature. To clarify the argument,I distinguish between on the one handcompleteness and on the other wholeness andtotality, as different all-embracing features:the former being epistemic while the latter –ontological.I propose an analogy between the Mach principleas a possible selection principle in generalrelativity, and the vicious-circle principle infoundations of mathematics. I finally concludewith a consequence of this analogyvis-à-vis completeness and totality,viz., both should be constrained if they wereto be valid concepts for a physical theory.
|Keywords||Philosophy Philosophy of Science Mathematical Logic and Foundations Methodology of the Social Sciences|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Matthias Baaz (ed.) (2011). Kurt Gödel and the Foundations of Mathematics: Horizons of Truth. Cambridge University Press.
Robert DiSalle (1990). Book Review:Mach I, Mach II, Einstein, und Die Relativitatstheorie. Eine Falschung und Ihre Folgen Gereon Wolter. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 57 (4):712-.
Margaret Morrison (2000). Unifying Scientific Theories: Physical Concepts and Mathematical Structures. Cambridge Univ Pr.
Richard Tieszen (2002). Gödel and the Intuition of Concepts. Synthese 133 (3):363 - 391.
Denis Fisette (2012). Phenomenology and Phenomenalism: Ernst Mach and the Genesis of Husserl's Phenomenology. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 22 (1):53-74.
B. Alan Wallace (2008). Embracing Mind: The Common Ground of Science and Spirituality. Shambhala Publications.
John Blackmore (1989). Ernst Mach Leaves 'the Church of Physics'. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (4):519-540.
John D. Norton (1995). Mach's Principle Before Einstein. In Julian B. Barbour & H. Pfister (eds.), Mach's Principle: From Newton's Bucket to Quantum Gravity. Birkhäuser.
Veit Pittioni (1989). Mach I, Mach II, Einstein and the Theory of Relativity. Philosophy and History 22 (1):57-57.
John D. Norton (2009). How Hume and Mach Helped Einstein Find Special Relativity. In Michael Friedman, Mary Domski & Michael Dickson (eds.), Discourse on a New Method: Reinvigorating the Marriage of History and Philosophy of Science. Open Court. 359--86.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #130,777 of 1,679,352 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #182,933 of 1,679,352 )
How can I increase my downloads?