David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Minds and Machines 14 (1):85-99 (2004)
This paper argues that information should be made transparent as a means to close the global digital divide problem. The usual conception of the digital divide as a bifurcation between the information rich and poor in fact does a poor job at describing the reality of the situation, which is characterized by multiple dimensions of digital divides in many contexts. Taking the lead from Albert Borgmann, it is recognized that the so-called information poor do possess a rich resource of information which needs to be fully accounted for in order to solve the global digital divide problem. In addition, making information transparent means, following the theory of development of Peruvian economist Hernando de Soto, that information should be made available and accessible through a system of representation. Floridis account of information ethics thus needs to be supplemented by the realization that members of infosphere, which in his view consist of information objects, should be made transparent in order that the global digital divide be ameliorated. In other words there should be a system of information about information, namely semantic representation of objective information which enables the locals to make full use of their available informational resources.
|Keywords||Computer Science Philosophy of Mind Artificial Intelligence Systems Theory, Control Interdisciplinary Studies|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Neil Kenneth McBride (2014). ACTIVE Ethics: An Information Systems Ethics for the Internet Age. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 12 (1):21-44.
Similar books and articles
Gian Maria Greco & Luciano Floridi (2004). The Tragedy of the Digital Commons. Ethics and Information Technology 6 (2):73-81.
Nir Fresco (2013). Information Processing as an Account of Concrete Digital Computation. Philosophy and Technology 26 (1):31-60.
Luciano Floridi (2005). The Ontological Interpretation of Informational Privacy. Ethics and Information Technology 7 (4):185-200.
Yiannis Laouris & Romina Laouri (2008). Can Information and Mobile Technologies Serve to Close the Economic, Educational, Digital, and Social Gaps and Accelerate Development? World Futures 64 (4):254 – 275.
Tere Vadén (2004). Digital Nominalism. Notes on the Ethics of Information Society in View of the Ontology of the Digital. Ethics and Information Technology 6 (4):223-231.
Kenneth L. Hacker & Shana M. Mason (2003). Ethical Gaps in Studies of the Digital Divide. Ethics and Information Technology 5 (2):99-115.
Zonghao Bao & Kun Xiang (2006). Digitalization and Global Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 8 (1):41-47.
Rafael Capurro (2006). Towards an Ontological Foundation of Information Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):175-186.
William Wresch (2009). Progress on the Global Digital Divide: An Ethical Perspective Based on Amartya Sen's Capabilities Model. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 11 (4):255-263.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads43 ( #96,036 of 1,796,174 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #85,286 of 1,796,174 )
How can I increase my downloads?