|Abstract||What is the point of asking yourself what to do and then thinking hard about it if all the thinking is settled in advance? What is the point of trying to figure out how to run your life if determinism governs your every reflection? Do we not have to suppose that determinism is false if we are to take our own deliberations seriously? The question has long been taken to bedevil the doctrine of determinism. It has been supposed that determinists can have no good answer to it. Well, Professor Kapitan is one good philosopher who thinks otherwise. He takes things forward. His piece will repay your close attention.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Tomis Kapitan (1992). Review: Review Essay: Thinking, Language and Experience. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (1):203 - 214.
Tomis Kapitan (1992). Thinking, Language and Experience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (1):203-214.
K. M. Nielsen (2011). Deliberation as Inquiry: Aristotle's Alternative to the Presumption of Open Alternatives. Philosophical Review 120 (3):383-421.
Tomis Kapitan (1991). How Powerful Are We? American Philosophical Quarterly (October) 331 (October):331-338.
David P. Hunt (1996). The Compatibility of Omniscience and Intentional Action: A Reply to Tomis Kapitan. Religious Studies 32 (1):49 - 60.
Tomis Kapitan (1986). Deliberation and the Presumption of Open Alternatives. Southern Journal of Philosophy 40 (April):230-51.
Tomis Kapitan (1995). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] Mind 104 (414).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #122,297 of 722,698 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,698 )
How can I increase my downloads?