David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Erkenntnis 73 (3):329 - 347 (2010)
The dominant view among macroeconomists is that macroeconomics reduces to microeconomics, both in the sense that all macroeconomic phenomena arise out of microeconomic phenomena and in the sense that macroeconomic theory—to the extent that it is correct—can be derived from microeconomic theory. More than that, the dominant view believes that macroeconomics should in practice use the reduced microeconomic theory: this is the program of microfoundations for macroeconomics to which the vast majority of macroeconomists adhere. The "microfoundational" models that they actually employ are, however, characterized by another feature: they are highly idealized, even when they are applied as direct characterizations of actual data, which itself consists of macroeconomic aggregates. This paper explores the interrelationship between reductionism and idealization in the microfoundational program and the role of idealization in empirical modeling
|Keywords||Philosophy Logic Ethics Ontology Epistemology Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
James Woodward (2003). Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford University Press.
Nancy Cartwright (1989). Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford University Press.
D. M. Hausman (1992). The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Kenneth J. Arrow (1952). Social Choice and Individual Values. Science and Society 16 (2):181-181.
Ernan McMullin (1985). Galilean Idealization. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 16 (3):247-273.
Citations of this work BETA
Kevin D. Hoover (2012). Causal Structure and Hierarchies of Models. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 43 (4):778-786.
Stan du Plessis (2010). Implications for Models in Monetary Policy. Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (4):429-444.
James Justus (2014). Methodological Individualism in Ecology. Philosophy of Science 81 (5):770-784.
Kevin D. Hoover (2012). Causal Structure and Hierarchies of Models. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (4):778-786.
Similar books and articles
Kevin D. Hoover (1993). Causality and Temporal Order in Macroeconomics or Why Even Economists Don't Know How to Get Causes From Probabilities. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (4):693-710.
Uskali Mäki (ed.) (2001). The Economic World View: Studies in the Ontology of Economics. Cambridge University Press.
Julian Reiss (2004). The Methodology of Empirical Macroeconomics by Kevin D. Hoover. Cambridge University Press 2001, XII + 186 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 20 (1):226-233.
Kevin D. Hoover (1995). Is Macroeconomics for Real? The Monist 78 (3):235-257.
Kevin D. Hoover (2005). Quantitative Evaluation of Idealized Models in the New Classical Macroeconomics. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 86 (1):15-34.
John D. Abell (1990). A Note on the Teaching of Ethics in the MBA Macroeconomics Course. Journal of Business Ethics 9 (1):21 - 29.
Roger W. Garrison (1992). Keynesian Splenetics: From Social Philosophy to Macroeconomics. Critical Review 6 (4):471-492.
Harold Kincaid & Don Ross (eds.) (2009). The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics. Oxford University Press.
Alan Nelson (1984). Some Issues Surrounding the Reduction of Macroeconomics to Microeconomics. Philosophy of Science 51 (4):573-594.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads48 ( #90,218 of 1,911,319 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #320,540 of 1,911,319 )
How can I increase my downloads?