The Origins of Object Knowledge
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (2009)
Do humans start life with the capacity to detect and mentally represent the objects around them? Or is our object knowledge instead derived only as the result of prolonged experience with the external world? Are we simply able to perceive objects by watching their actions in the world, or do we have to act on objects ourselves in order to learn about their behavior? Finally, do we come to know all aspects of objects in the same way, or are some aspects of our object understanding more epistemologically privileged than others? "The Origins of Object Knowledge" presents the most up-to-date survey of the research into how the developing human mind understands the world of objects and their properties. It presents some of the best findings from leading research groups in the field of object representation approached from the perspective of developmental and comparative psychology. Topics covered in the book all address some aspect of what objects are from a psychological perspective; how humans and animals conceive what they are made of; what properties they possess; how we count them and how we categorize them; even how the difference between animate and inanimate objects leads to different expectations. The chapters also cover the variety of methodologies and techniques that must be used to study infants, young children, and non-human primates and the value of combining approaches to discovering what each group knows. Bringing together leading researchers, communicating the most contemporary and exciting findings within the field of object representation, this volume will be an important work in the cognitive sciences, and of interest to those across the fields of developmental and comparative psychology.
|Keywords||Mental representation Object (Philosophy Knowledge representation (Information theory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Call number||BF316.6.O75 2009|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
Renée Baillargeon, Sylvia di WuYuan, Jie Li & Yuyan Luo, Young Infants' Expectations About Self-Propelled Objects.
Renée Baillargeon, Di Wu, Sylvia Yuan, Jie Li & Luo & Yuyan, Young Infants' Expectations About Self-Propelled Objects.
Kerry E. Jordan & Brannon & M. Elizabeth, A Comparative Approach to Understanding Human Numerical Cognition.
Erik W. Cheries, Stephen R. Mitroff, Karen Wynn & Brian J. Scholl, Do the Same Principles Constrain Persisting Object Representations in Infant Cognition and Adult Perception?: The Cases of Continuity and Cohesion.
Erik W. Cheries, Stephen R. Mitroff, Karen Wynn & Scholl & J. Brian, Do the Same Principles Constrain Persisting Object Representation in Infant Cognition and Adult Perception? The Cases of Continuity and Cohesion.
M. L. Chen & A. M. Leslie, Multiple Object Tracking in Infants: Four (or so) Ways of Being Discrete.
Jennifer M. Zosh & Feigenson & Lisa, Beyond 'What' and 'How Many': Capacity, Complexity and Resolution of Infants' Object Representations.
Jonathan I. Flombaum, Brian J. Scholl & Laurie R. Santos, Spatiotemporal Priority as a Fundamental Principle of Object Persistence.
Jonathan I. Flombaum, Brian J. Scholl & Santos & R. Laurie, Spatiotemporal Priority as a Fundamental Principle of Object Persistence.
Nathalia Gjersoe & Hood & Bruce, Clever Eyes and Stupid Hands: Current Thoughts on Why Dissociations of Apparent Knowledge Occur on Solidity Tasks.
Laurie R. Santos & Hood & M. Bruce, Object Representation as a Central Issue in Cognitive Science.
Marian L. Chen & Leslie & M. Alan, Multiple Object Tracking in Infants': Four (or so) Ways of Being Discrete.
Kristin Shutts, Lori Markson & Spelke & S. Elizabeth, The Developmental Origins of Animal and Artefact Concepts.
K. Shutts, L. Markson, E. S. Spelke, B. Hood & L. Santos, The Developmental Origins of Animal and Artifact Concepts.
Fei Xu, Kathryn Dewar & Amy Perfors, Induction, Overhypotheses, and the Shape Bias: Some Arguments and Evidence for Rational Constructivism.
Fei Xu, Kathryn Dewar & Perfors & Amy, Induction, Overhypotheses, and the Shape Bias: Some Arguments and Evidence for Rational Constructivism.
Jennifer M. Zosh & Lisa Feigenson, Beyond 'What'and 'How Many': Capacity, Complexity, and Resolution of Infants' Object Representations.
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robert L. Goldstone (1998). Objects, Please Remain Composed. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):472-473.
Reza Zamani (2010). An Object-Oriented View on Problem Representation as a Search-Efficiency Facet: Minds Vs. Machines. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 20 (1):103-117.
Glyn W. Humphreys & Emer M. E. Forde (2001). Hierarchies, Similarity, and Interactivity in Object Recognition: “Category-Specific” Neuropsychological Deficits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):453-476.
Casey O'Callaghan (2008). Object Perception: Vision and Audition. Philosophy Compass 3 (4):803-829.
Cynthia Macdonald (1998). Tropes and Other Things. In Stephen Laurence & Cynthia Macdonald (eds.), Contemporary Readings in the Foundations of Metaphysics. Blackwell.
Glyn W. Humphreys & M. Jane Riddoch (2007). How to Define an Object: Evidence From the Effects of Action on Perception and Attention. Mind and Language 22 (5):534–547.
Jose Bermudez (2007). The Object Properties Model of Object Perception: Between the Binding Model and the Theoretical Model. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (s 9-10):43-65.
Xiang Chen (2007). The Object Bias and the Study of Scientific Revolutions: Lessons From Developmental Psychology. Philosophical Psychology 20 (4):479 – 503.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-09-15
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?