David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (2):pp. 219-245 (2008)
Husserl's theory of perception is remarkable in several respects. For one thing, Husserl rigorously distinguishes the parts and properties of the act of consciousness - its content -from the parts and properties of the object perceived. Second, Husserl's repeated insistence that perceptual consciousness places its subject in touch with the perceived object itself, rather than some representation that does duty for it, vindicates the commonsensical and phenomenologically grounded belief that when a thing appears to us, it is precisely that thing, rather than some other thing (its 'appearance'), that we perceive. Third, his distinction between empty and intuitive acts, and his descriptions of their complex interplay in perceptual consciousness, provides a way of making sense of the fact that an object can be perceived even when some of its parts and properties are not. Finally, his theory of perceptual acts as constituents of higher-order acts of fulfilment provides one of the few detailed accounts in the philosophical literature of how a perceptual experience can transform a mere thought into knowledge, despite the fact that the relation between perception and belief is not a logical or inferential one. Because Husserl's theory of perception is a serious candidate for truth, it is also a serious candidate for philosophical criticism. As such, in what follows I will treat it as a live force to be reckoned with rather than a historical curiosity.
|Keywords||Husserl Sensation Perception Interpretation consciousness|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Carolyn Dicey Jennings (2015). Attention and Perceptual Organization. Philosophical Studies 172 (5):1265-1278.
Michael Madary (2012). Husserl on Perceptual Constancy. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (1):145-165.
Michael Shim (2011). Representationalism and Husserlian Phenomenology. Husserl Studies 27 (3):197-215.
Kris Mcdaniel (2014). Metaphysics, History, Phenomenology. Res Philosophica 91 (3):339-365.
Kenneth Williford (2013). Husserl's Hyletic Data and Phenomenal Consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 12 (3):501-519.
Similar books and articles
David W. Hamlyn (1994). Perception, Sensation, and Non-Conceptual Content. Philosophical Quarterly 44 (175):139-53.
Pete Mandik (2005). Action-Oriented Representation. In Andrew Brook & Kathleen Akins (eds.), Cognition and the Brain: The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement. Cambridge University Press 284--305.
Charles Hartshorne (1963). Sensation in Psychology and Philosophy. Southern Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):3-14.
Ka-Wing Leung (2011). Meaning and Intuitive Act in the Logical Investigations. Husserl Studies 27 (2):125-142.
E. L. Mascall (1964). Perception and Sensation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 64:259-272.
Todd Buras (2009). The Function of Sensations in Reid. Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (3):pp. 329-353.
Davide Panagia (2009). The Political Life of Sensation. Duke University Press.
George Teschner (1981). The Undifferentiated Conjunction of Sensation and Judgment in Perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 42 (September):119-122.
Ramon M. Lemos (1964). Sensation, Perception, and the Given. Ratio 6 (June):63-80.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads68 ( #48,086 of 1,725,606 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #53,227 of 1,725,606 )
How can I increase my downloads?