David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Studies 127 (1):19 - 35 (2006)
Two themes run through Wollheim’s work: the importance of history to the practice and appreciation of the arts, and the centrality of experience in appreciation. Prima facie, these are in tension. Reconciling them requires two steps. First, adopt a notion of experience on which features can be experienced even if we must have experience-independent access to the fact that the work exhibits them. Second, state what makes a particular experience appropriate to the work. What does so? Although Wollheim toyed with a more ambitious line, I suggest that he should have given the obvious answer, that the appropriate experience reflects the work’s nature.
|Keywords||Painting History Forgery Value|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Nelson Goodman (1968). Languages of Art. Bobbs-Merrill.
Kendall L. Walton (1970). Categories of Art. Philosophical Review 79 (3):334-367.
Arthur Coleman Danto (1981). The Transfiguration of the Commonplace: A Philosophy of Art. Harvard University Press.
Richard Wollheim (1989). Painting as an Art. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 47 (3):281-284.
Citations of this work BETA
Alessandro Pignocchi (2010). How the Intentions of the Draftsman Shape Perception of a Drawing. Consciousness and Cognition 19 (4):887-898.
Similar books and articles
J. Baird Callicott (2003). Wetland Gloom and Wetland Glory. Philosophy and Geography 6 (1):33 – 45.
Robert Hopkins (2005). Aesthetics, Experience, and Discrimination. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (2):119–133.
Andrew Benjamin (2011). On the Image of Painting. Research in Phenomenology 41 (2):181-205.
Rodolfo Llinas (2008). Of Self and Self Awareness: The Basic Neuronal Circuit in Human Consciousness and the Generation of Self. Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (9):64-74.
Robert Hopkins (2003). What Makes Representational Painting Truly Visual? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):149–167.
Richard Wollheim (2001). Richard Wollheim on the Art of Painting: Art as Representation and Expression. Cambridge University Press.
Nigel Wentworth (2004). The Phenomenology of Painting. Cambridge University Press.
Robert Schroer (2008). The Woman in the Painting and the Image in the Penny: An Investigation of Phenomenological Doubleness, Seeing-in, and “Reversed Seeing-In”. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 139 (3):329 - 341.
Richard Wollheim (2003). What Makes Representational Painting Truly Visual? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):131–147.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads67 ( #65,801 of 1,911,608 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #321,691 of 1,911,608 )
How can I increase my downloads?