Painting, sculpture, sight, and touch
British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (2):149-166 (2004)
| Abstract | I raise two questions that bear on the aesthetics of painting and sculpture. First, painting involves perspective, in the sense that everything represented in a painting is represented from a point, or points, within represented space; is sculpture also perspectival? Second, painting is specially linked to vision; is sculpture linked in this way either to vision or to touch? To clarify the link between painting and vision, I describe the perspectival structure of vision. Since this is the same structure we find in painting, the link is that painting manifests the perspective of vision. Touch is also perspectival, but the perspective involved is different from that in vision. Thus we can answer my second question, concerning the relations of the art forms to the senses, by addressing the first, concerning the role of perspective in sculpture. I argue that sculpture exhibits neither the perspectival structure of vision, nor that of touch. It is not perspectival, and it is not linked to either sense as painting is to vision. I close by considering the aesthetic significance of these conclusions. + This paper is a modified version of an Inaugural Lecture at the University of Sheffield. I am grateful to the University, for the opportunity to give the lecture; to my colleagues and friends, for their generous support on that occasion; to Marion Thain, for discussion; and to the Leverhulme Trust, for the award of a Philip Leverhulme prize, which made possible the research here presented. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesHaig Khatchadourian (1974). On the Nature of Painting and Sculpture. British Journal of Aesthetics 14 (4):326-343.
F. David Martin (1978). Sculpture, Painting, and Damage. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 37 (1):47-52.
Paul Carter (2004). Material Thinking: The Theory and Practice of Creative Research. Melbourne University Publishing.
David Johnson (2009). Merleau-Ponty and the Other World of Painting: A Response. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 40 (1):89-97.
Johann Gottfried Herder (2002). Sculpture: Some Observations on Shape and Form From Pygmalion's Creative Dream. University of Chicago Press.
R. Hopkins (2010). Sculpture and Perspective. British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (4):357-373.
Nigel Wentworth (2004). The Phenomenology of Painting. Cambridge University Press.
Vlad Ionescu (2011). Deleuze's Tensive Notion of Painting in the Light of Riegl, Wöölfflin and Worringer. Deleuze Studies 5 (1):52-62.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads39 ( #29,888 of 549,694 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,694 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
