David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Peter Goldie & Elisabeth Schellekens (eds.), Philosophy and Conceptual Art. Oxford University Press (2007)
I first try to identify what problem, if any conceptual art poses for philosophical aesthetics. It is harder than one might think to formulate some claim about traditional art with which much conceptual art is inconsistent. The idea that sense experience plays a special role in the appreciation of traditional artworks falls foul of literature. Instead I focus on the idea that conceptual art exhibits a particularly loose relation between the properties with which we engage in appreciating it and the properties on which those artistic properties depend. In Part II, I then offer an account of how conceptual art communicates, and attempt to use it to illuminate some prominent features of that art. I suggest it works by frustrating certain fundamental expectations with which we approach it. In this it is analogous to certain ways of indirectly communicating in conversation – certain kinds of conversational implicature. At the close, I ask whether this account allows us to address the problem identified in Part I
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Diarmuid Costello (2007). Kant After Lewitt: Towards an Aesthetics of Conceptual Art. In Peter Goldie & Elisabeth Schellekens (eds.), Philosophy and Conceptual Art. Oxford University Press 92.
Elisabeth Schellekens (2005). Seeing is Believing' and 'Believing is Seeing. Acta Analytica 20 (4):10-23.
Matthew Kieran (2007). Artistic Character, Creativity, and the Appraisal of Conceptual Art. In Peter Goldie & Elisabeth Schellekens (eds.), Philosophy and Conceptual Art. Oxford University Press 197.
Donald H. Karshan (1970). Conceptual Art and Conceptual Aspects. New York,New York Cultural Center.
Peter Goldie & Elisabeth Schellekens (eds.) (2007). Philosophy and Conceptual Art. Oxford University Press.
Derek Matravers (2007). The Dematerialization of the Object. In Peter Goldie & Elisabeth Schellekens (eds.), Philosophy and Conceptual Art. Oxford University Press
Dominic McIver Lopes (2007). Conceptual Art is Not What It Seems. In Peter Goldie & Elisabeth Schellekens (eds.), Philosophy and Conceptual Art. Oxford University Press
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #107,737 of 1,906,928 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #200,756 of 1,906,928 )
How can I increase my downloads?