David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (1):149-167 (2000)
Congenitally blind people can make and understand ‘tactile pictures’ – representations form of raised ridges on flat surfaces. If made visible, these representations can serve as pictures for the sighted. Does it follow that we should take at face value the idea that they are pictures made for touch? I explore this question, and the related issue of the aesthetics of ‘tactile pictures’ by considering the role in both depiction and pictorial aesthetics of experience, and by asking how far the experience of those engaging with representations through touch can approximate to that of those engaging with them through sight.
|Keywords||Pictorial representation Pictorial aesthetics Touch Sight The senses D.M.Lopes|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
John Kulvicki (2006). Pictorial Representation. Philosophy Compass 1 (6):535–546.
Erik Koed (2005). Sculpture and the Sculptural. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (2):147 - 154.
Similar books and articles
Robert Hopkins (2008). Reasons for Looking: Lopes on the Value of Pictures. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (2):556-569.
Dominic M. McIver Lopes (2002). Vision, Touch, and the Value of Pictures. British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (2):191-201.
Dominic Lopes (1996). Understanding Pictures. Oxford University Press.
Dominic Mciver Lopes (2004). Directive Pictures. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (2):189–196.
Dominic Lopes (1995). Pictorial Realism. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (3):277-285.
Robert Hopkins (2010). Inflected Pictorial Experience: Its Treatment and Significance. In Catharine Abell & Katerina Bantinaki (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Picturing. Oxford University Press
Dominic Gregory (2010). Pictures, Pictorial Contents and Vision. British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):15-32.
M. Pettersson (2011). Seeing What Is Not There: Pictorial Experience, Imagination and Non-Localization. British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (3):279-294.
Bence Nanay (2005). Is Twofoldness Necessary for Representational Seeing? British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3):248-257.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads81 ( #55,285 of 1,934,832 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #66,510 of 1,934,832 )
How can I increase my downloads?