David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (3):593-622 (2000)
One so-called paradox of blackmail concerns the fact that “two legal whites together make a black.” That is, it is licit to threaten to reveal a person’s secret, and it is separately lawful to ask him for money; but when both are undertaken at once, together, this act iscalled blackmail and is prohibited. A second so-called paradox is that if the blackmailer initiates the act, this is seen by jurists asblackmail and illicit, while if the blackmailee (the person blackmailed) originates the contract, this is commonly interpreted as bribery and is not illicit.But these are paradoxes only for legal theorists innocent of libertarian theory. The authors use that perspective to reject the claim thatblackmail should be unlawful. If this act were legalized, then both paradoxes would disappear, precisely their contention
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael L. Gross (2010). Moral Dilemmas of Modern War: Torture, Assassination, and Blackmail in an Age of Asymmetric Conflict. Cambridge University Press.
Russell L. Christopher (2009). A Political Theory of Blackmail: A Reply to Professor Dripps. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (3):261-269.
Lawrence Alexander (1984). Another Look at Moral Blackmail. Philosophy Research Archives 10:189-196.
Michael Clark (1994). There Is No Paradox of Blackmail. Analysis 54 (1):54 - 61.
Joel Feinberg (1988). The Paradox of Blackmail. Ratio Juris 1 (1):83-95.
Michael Gorr (1992). Liberalism and the Paradox of Blackmail. Philosophy and Public Affairs 21 (1):43-66.
Nicholas J. J. Smith (2000). The Principle of Uniform Solution (of the Paradoxes of Self-Reference). Mind 109 (433):117-122.
Christopher Menzel (1984). Cantor and the Burali-Forti Paradox. The Monist 67 (1):92-107.
Keith Simmons (2005). A Berry and a Russell Without Self-Reference. Philosophical Studies 126 (2):253 - 261.
Donald A. Dripps (2009). The Priority of Politics and Procedure Over Perfectionism in Penal Law, or, Blackmail in Perspective. Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (3):247-260.
Ingmar Persson (2004). Two Act-Omission Paradoxes. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (2):147–162.
Dustin Tucker & Richmond H. Thomason (2011). Paradoxes of Intensionality. Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):394-411.
S. D. Rieber (1994). The Paradoxes of Analysis and Synonymy. Erkenntnis 41 (1):103 - 116.
Stephen Read (2006). Symmetry and Paradox. History and Philosophy of Logic 27 (4):307-318.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads12 ( #195,132 of 1,707,716 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #104,804 of 1,707,716 )
How can I increase my downloads?