Agency and Alienation

In Mario De Caro & David Macarthur (eds.), Naturalism In Question. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. pp. 173-87 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is argued that the standard story of human action, as it is standardly naturalistically understood, should be rejected. Rather than seeking an agent amidst the workings of the mind (as in Velleman's "What Happens When Someone Acts"), we need to recognize an agent’s place in the world she inhabits. And in order to do so we have to resist the naturalistic assumptions of the standard causal story.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-26

Downloads
247 (#77,609)

6 months
10 (#187,567)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jennifer Hornsby
Birkbeck College

Citations of this work

Success semantics: the sequel.Bence Nanay - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (1):151-165.
Agential capacities: a capacity to guide.Denis Buehler - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 179 (1):21-47.
Explicating Agency: The Case of Visual Attention.Denis Buehler - 2023 - Philosophical Quarterly 73 (2):379-413.
The Instrumental Structure of Actions.Markos Valaris - 2015 - Philosophical Quarterly 65 (258):64-83.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The View From Nowhere.Thomas Nagel - 1986 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Mind and World.John McDowell - 1994 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Internal and External Reasons.Bernard Williams - 1979 - In Ross Harrison (ed.), Rational action: studies in philosophy and social science. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 101-113.

View all 22 references / Add more references