Argument construction and reinstatement in logics for defeasible reasoning

Abstract
This paper points out some problems with two recent logical systems – one due to Prakken and Sartor, the other due to Kowalski and Toni – designedfor the representation of defeasible arguments in general, but with a specialemphasis on legal reasoning.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1011288805074
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 20,845
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
John Horty (2007). Defaults with Priorities. Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (4):367 - 413.
Xavier Parent (2011). Moral Particularism in the Light of Deontic Logic. Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (2-3):75-98.
John Horty (2007). Defaults with Priorities. Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (4):367-413.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

33 ( #121,424 of 1,906,922 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #162,558 of 1,906,922 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.