Blobjectivism and Indirect Correspondence
Facta Philosophica 2:249-270 (2000)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesD. Patterson (2003). What is a Correspondence Theory of Truth? Synthese 137 (3):421 - 444.
Terry Horgan, John Tienson & Matjaž Potrč (2002). Editors' Introduction. Southern Journal of Philosophy 40 (S1):7-8.
Terry Horgan (2000). Facing Up to the Sorites Paradox. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 6:99-111.
Gerhard Schurz (2011). Structural Correspondence, Indirect Reference, and Partial Truth: Phlogiston Theory and Newtonian Mechanics. Synthese 180 (2):103-120.
Vojko Strahovnik (2005). Meinongian Scorekeeping. In Alfred Schramm (ed.), Meinong Studien.
Terry Horgan & Matjaž Potrč (2006). Particularist Semantic Normativity. Acta Analytica 21 (1):45-61.
Matjaž Potrč (2002). Transvaluationism, Common Sense and Indirect Correspondence. Acta Analytica 17 (1):101-119.
Terry Horgan & Matjaž Potrč (2002). Addressing Questions for Blobjectivism. Facta Philosophica 4:311-322.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-05-18Total downloads50 ( #21,076 of 548,980 )Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #8,781 of 548,980 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
