Compatibilism and the consequence argument
Philosophical Studies 47 (May):339-56 (1985)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Compatibilism Consequence Epistemology Lewis, D Van Inwagen, P | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesHelen Beebee & Alfred R. Mele (2002). Humean Compatibilism. Mind 111 (442):201-223.
Thomas M. Crisp & Ted A. Warfield (2000). The Irrelevance of Indeterministic Counterexamples to Principle Beta. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):173-185.
Michael Huemer (2000). Van Inwagen's Consequence Argument. Philosophical Review 109 (4):525-544.
John Perry (2004). Compatibilist Options. In David Shier, Michael O'Rourke & Joseph Keim Campbell (eds.), Freedom and Determinism. MIT Press/Bradford Book.
David Lewis (1981). Are We Free to Break the Laws? Theoria 47 (3):113-21.
Peter van Inwagen (1985). On Two Arguments for Compatibilism. Analysis 45 (June):161-163.
Lynne Rudder Baker (2008). The Irrelevance of the Consequence Argument. Analysis 68 (297):13–22.
Christopher S. Hill (1992). Van Inwagen on the Consequence Argument. Analysis 52 (2):49-55.
S. Oakley (2006). Defending Lewis's Local Miracle Compatibilism. Philosophical Studies 130 (2):337-349.
Benjamin Schnieder (2004). Compatibilism and the Notion of Rendering Something False. Philosophical Studies 117 (3):409-428.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads50 ( #21,132 of 549,088 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,722 of 549,088 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
