Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Stanford University Press (2002)
Dialectic of Enlightenment is undoubtedly the most influential publication of the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory. Written during the Second World War and circulated privately, it appeared in a printed edition in Amsterdam in 1947. "What we had set out to do," the authors write in the Preface, "was nothing less than to explain why humanity, instead of entering a truly human state, is sinking into a new kind of barbarism." Yet the work goes far beyond a mere critique of contemporary events. Historically remote developments, indeed, the birth of Western history and of subjectivity itself out of the struggle against natural forces, as represented in myths, are connected in a wide arch to the most threatening experiences of the present. The book consists in five chapters, at first glance unconnected, together with a number of shorter notes. The various analyses concern such phenomena as the detachment of science from practical life, formalized morality, the manipulative nature of entertainment culture, and a paranoid behavioral structure, expressed in aggressive anti-Semitism, that marks the limits of enlightenment. The authors perceive a common element in these phenomena, the tendency toward self-destruction of the guiding criteria inherent in enlightenment thought from the beginning. Using historical analyses to elucidate the present, they show, against the background of a prehistory of subjectivity, why the National Socialist terror was not an aberration of modern history but was rooted deeply in the fundamental characteristics of Western civilization. Adorno and Horkheimer see the self-destruction of Western reason as grounded in a historical and fateful dialectic between the domination of external nature and society. They trace enlightenment, which split these spheres apart, back to its mythical roots. Enlightenment and myth, therefore, are not irreconcilable opposites, but dialectically mediated qualities of both real and intellectual life. "Myth is already enlightenment, and enlightenment reverts to mythology." This paradox is the fundamental thesis of the book. This new translation, based on the text in the complete edition of the works of Max Horkheimer, contains textual variants, commentary upon them, and an editorial discussion of the position of this work in the development of Critical Theory.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$42.95 used (34% off) $58.41 new (11% off) $62.41 direct from Amazon (4% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||B3279.H8473.P513 2002|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Craig Reeves (2009). Causality and Critical Theory: Nature's Order in Adorno, Cartwright and Bhaskar. Journal of Critical Realism 8 (3):316-342.
Hans-Joerg Ehni & Diana Aurenque (2012). On Moral Enhancement From a Habermasian Perspective. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (02):223-234.
Derek R. Ford (2015). The Pneumatic Common: Learning in, with and From the Air. Educational Philosophy and Theory 47 (13-14):1405-1418.
Michelle Kosch (2015). Agency and Self‐Sufficiency in Fichte's Ethics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91 (2):348-380.
Hans G. Despain (2013). Debate Integral Theory. Journal of Critical Realism 12 (4):507-517.
Similar books and articles
Graeme Garrard (2006). Counter-Enlightenments: From the Eighteenth-Century to the Present. Routledge.
Nigel Tubbs, Hegel and the Dialectic of Enlightenment : The Recognition of Education in Civil Society.
Marianna Papastephanou (2000). Ulysses' Reason, Nobody's Fault: Reason, Subjectivity and the Critique of Enlightenment. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (6):47-59.
Anthony J. Cascardi (1999). Consequences of Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.
Alfredo Lucero-Montano (2006). Horkheimer and Adorno's Dialectic of Enlightenment. Philosophy Pathways 114.
Theodor W. Adorno (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Stanford University Press.
Hauke Brunkhorst (2000). Enlightenment of Rationality: Remarks on Horkheimer and Adorno's Dialectic of Enlightenment. Constellations 7 (1):133-140.
John Abromeit (2011). Max Horkheimer and the Foundations of the Frankfurt School. Cambridge University Press.
Avner Cohen (2011). Myth and Myth Criticism Following the Dialectic of Enlightenment. The European Legacy 15 (5):583-598.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?