Neuron doctrine: Trivial versus radical versus do not dichotomize
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):839-840 (1999)
| Abstract | Gold & Stoljar argue that there are two (often confused) neuron doctrines, one trivial and the other radical, with only the latter having the consequence that non-neuroscientific sciences of the mind will be discarded. They also attempt to show that there is no evidence supporting the radical doctrine. It is argued here that their dichotomy is artificial and misrepresents modern approaches to understanding the neuroscientific correlates of cognition and behavior. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesNick Chater (1999). Why Biological Neuroscience Cannot Replace Psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):834-834.
Valerie Gray Hardcastle (1999). The Nontrivial Doctrine of Cognitive Neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):839-839.
Tony Stone & Martin Davies (2000). Autonomous Psychology and the Moderate Neuron Doctrine. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):849-850.
James Fahey & Michael Zenzen (1999). Reductionism and the Neuron Doctrine: A Metaphysical Fix of Gold & Stoljar's Trivial–Radical Distinction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):835-836.
Dale Jamieson (1999). The “Trivial Neuron Doctrine” is Not Trivial. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):841-842.
J. Tim O'Meara (1999). Begging the Question of Causation in a Critique of the Neuron Doctrine. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):846-846.
Joe Y. F. Lau (1999). A More Substantive Neuron Doctrine. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):843-844.
John A. Bullinaria (1999). Levels of Description and Conflated Doctrines. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):832-833.
Ian Gold & Daniel Stoljar (1999). Interpreting Neuroscience and Explaining the Mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):856-866.
Steven G. Daniel (1999). How Trivial is the “Trivial Neuron Doctrine”? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):834-835.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads2 ( #234,650 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
