Philosophers' Imprint 7 (3):1-28 (2007)
|Abstract||The goal of this paper is to frame a theory of reasons--what they are, how they support actions or conclusions--using the tools of default logic. After sketching the basic account of reasons as provided by defaults, I show how it can be elaborated to deal with two more complicated issues: first, situations in which the priority relation among defaults, and so reasons as well, is itself established through default reasoning; second, the treatment of undercutting defeat and exclusionary reasons. Finally, and by way of application, I show how the resulting account can shed some light on Jonathan Dancy's argument from reason holism to a form of extreme particularism in moral theory|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Roger Crisp (2007). Ethics Without Reasons? Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (1):40-49.
Sean McKeever & Michael Ridge (2007). Turning on Default Reasons. Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (1):55-76.
Ferenc Huoranszki (2006). Reasons and Passions. Acta Analytica 21 (2):41-53.
Jonathan Dancy (2004). Ethics Without Principles. Oxford University Press.
G. Aldo Antonelli (1999). A Directly Cautious Theory of Defeasible Consequence for Default Logic Via the Notion of General Extension. Artificial Intelligence 109 (1-2):71-109.
Anna Bergqvist (2010). Why Sibley is Not a Generalist After All. British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):1-14.
Pekka Väyrynen (2004). Particularism and Default Reasons. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (1):53-79.
Simon Robertson (2008). Not so Enticing Reasons. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (3):263 - 277.
Paolo Liberatore (2007). Consistency Defaults. Studia Logica 86 (1):89 - 110.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads58 ( #17,289 of 556,895 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #5,677 of 556,895 )
How can I increase my downloads?