David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Quarterly 50 (197):452-470 (1999)
It has become increasingly common recently to construe human natureas setting some pretty stringent limits to moral endeavour. Many consequentialists, in particular, take considerations concerning human nature to defeat certain demanding norms that would otherwise follow from their theory. One argument is that certain commitments ground psychological incapacitiesthat prevent us from doing what would maximize the good. Another is that we would be likely to suffer some kind of psychological demoralization if we tried to become significantly more selfless. I argue that influential versions of both of these arguments underestimate our deliberative resources, and also fail to examine the kind of moral sources that may be able to sustain rigorous moral endeavour. Pessimism about our capacities for such endeavour results from the neglect of these factors, rather than from uncovering any significant limitations in human nature.
|Keywords||demandingness human nature consequentialism moral sources|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Peter Singer (1993). Practical Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Frank Jackson (1991). Decision-Theoretic Consequentialism and the Nearest and Dearest Objection. Ethics 101 (3):461-482.
Roger Crisp (1992). Utilitarianism and the Life of Virtue. Philosophical Quarterly 42 (167):139-160.
Danny Scoccia (1990). Utilitarianism, Sociobiology, and the Limits of Benevolence. Journal of Philosophy 87 (7):329-345.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Tom Sorell (2002). Review: Human Nature and the Limits of Science. [REVIEW] Mind 111 (444):855-860.
Galia Patt-Shamir (2011). The Limits of Empathy - A Mengzi 'an Perspective'. Comparative and Continental Philosophy 2 (2):253-274.
Camille Atkinson (2007). Kant on Human Nature and Radical Evil. Philosophy and Theology 19 (1/2):215-224.
Dominick LaCapra (2009). History and its Limits: Human, Animal, Violence. Cornell University Press.
Hugh LaFollette (1989). Animal Rights and Human Wrongs. In Nigel Dower (ed.), Ethics and the Environment.
Jack Green Musselman (2009). Pt. 1. Thomistic Foundations : Natural Law Theory, Synderesis and Practical Reason. Human Nature and its Limits / Christopher Tollefsen ; Synderesis, Law, and Virtue / Angela McKay ; Human Nature and Moral Goodness / Patrick Lee ; Natural Law for Teaching Ethics : An Essential Tool and Not a Seamless Web. [REVIEW] In Mark J. Cherry (ed.), The Normativity of the Natural: Human Goods, Human Virtues, and Human Flourishing. Springer
Dale Jamieson (2000). :Beyond Evolution: Human Nature and the Limits of Evolutionary Explanation. Ethics 110 (2):436-437.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads231 ( #10,447 of 1,792,075 )
Recent downloads (6 months)83 ( #6,546 of 1,792,075 )
How can I increase my downloads?