David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (203):355 - 375 (2011)
Thomas of Aquino, from the time he wrote his commentary on the ’Sentences’ through writing the ’Summa of Theology’, recognized how far beyond Aristotle’s was the rational theology of Avicenna. After perfecting his approach to proving the existence of God in the "five ways," Aquinas further developed Avicenna’s organization for treating God’s nature by simplifying Avicenna’s often convoluted thought and added his own developments in content and order. In sum, Aquinas’s treatment of God’s nature depends closely upon Avicenna’s treatment of the subject in his ’Metaphysics’ 8.3-7, even more so than upon Aristotle. This conclusion can be seen by comparing the doctrines of Aristotle, Avicenna and Aquinas on the divine nature
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Peter Furlong (2009). The Latin Avicenna and Aquinas on the Relationship Between God and the Subject of Metaphysics. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:129-140.
Rahim Acar (2005). Talking About God and Talking About Creation: Avicenna's and Thomas Aquinas' Positions. Brill.
John F. Wippel (1999). Thomas Aquinas, Siger of Brabant, and Their Use of Avicenna in Clarifying the Subject of Metaphysics. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:15-26.
R. E. Houser (2010). The Language of Being and the Nature of God in the Aristotelian Tradition. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:113-132.
Václav Němec (2011). Tomášovo pojetí esence v De ente et essentia a jeho zdroje. Studia Neoaristotelica 8 (1):38-71.
Peter Adamson (2005). On Knowledge of Particulars. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (3):273–294.
Henrik Lagerlund (2009). Avicenna and Ūsī on Modal Logic. History and Philosophy of Logic 30 (3):227-239.
Norman Kretzmann (2001). The Metaphysics of Theism: Aquinas's Natural Theology in Summa Contra Gentiles I. Clarendon Press.
Norman Kretzmann (1999). The Metaphysics of Creation: Aquinas's Natural Theology in Summa Contra Gentiles II. Clarendon Press.
Lawrence Moonan (2011). Re-Tracing the Five Famous Ways of 'Summa Theologiae' I.2.3. International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (204):437 - 450.
David Torrijos-Castrillejo (2011). Santo Tomás y el motor inmóvil. Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval 18:123-136.
Avicenna (2004). The Metaphysics of the Healing: A Parallel English-Arabic Text = Al-Ilahīyāt Min Al-Shifāʼ. Brigham Young University Press.
Tony Street (2000). Avicenna and Tusi on the Contradiction and Conversion of the Absolute. History and Philosophy of Logic 21 (1):45-56.
Roland J. Teske (2007). Some Aspects of Henry of Ghent's Debt to Avicenna's Metaphysics. Modern Schoolman 85 (1):51 - 70.
Added to index2012-06-17
Total downloads9 ( #160,457 of 1,103,217 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #121,213 of 1,103,217 )
How can I increase my downloads?